Oct 092002
 
one reel

A group of twenty-something dance-clubbers decide to play with a makeshift Ouija board, summoning a djinn that possess one of them. The fire spirit is soon killing them, one by one.

Well, it’s British. That’s about the only thing that makes the randomly titled Long Time Dead stand out. In this standard, slow, talky, Teen Slasher, the deaths are generally off screen (but there’s plenty of blood afterwards). I’m sure the characters had names and separate personalities, but I didn’t notice. One was black, so that helped a little. The white guys should have worn numbers so I could tell them apart (maybe with the order they’d be killed so I could leave the room without missing anything).

The low budget shows in the large amount of time spent with various lone characters looking scared as the music builds. Each character is doing nothing and nothing is happening around him. You know you’re in trouble when the camera lingers on a guy looking at a computer screen with wide eyes as the “this is scary” music oh-so-slowly gets louder. That’s some fine screen-looking there. We don’t see what’s on the screen; we just watch him watch. Hey, if that’s entertainment, I know some computer labs that are just a party waiting to happen.

It all ends with the same twist that ends every other Slasher. Haven’t seen this film? Yes; yes you have.

 Reviews, Slashers Tagged with:
Oct 092002
 
two reels

A stereotypical good ol’ boy serenades us with the wonders of a white trash Christmas.  3 min.

Radio DJ Bob Rivers has been composing parody songs for many years, and like most parodies, they are kind’a funny once, and drift rapidly toward the annoying.  Written with Spike O’Neil and Joe Bryant, two of the staff members of his Seattle radio show, White Trash Christmas is sung to the tune of White Christmas, and drifts a little faster than most.  It repeats the normal red neck jokes, transplanting them to the holiday: decorating the mobile home, cousins kissing, Mad Dog and Miller Lite to drink, and howlin’ hound dogs.

Now with the help of the Internet and flash animation, anyone can be a filmmaker.  The short White Trash Christmas is just the song with animated characters acting out those white trash moments.  The cartoons don’t add much to the song, but they don’t take away anything.  At three minutes, it’s worth a look, once.

Oct 082002
 
two reels

Years after becoming Santa Claus, Scott Calvin  (Tim Allen) discovers that his now teenaged son is on the “naughty list” and that he must find a wife before Christmas or cease being Santa.

Quick Review: The 1998 The Santa Clause was a surprisingly delightful, simple, Christmas film, playing with the traditional view of Santa by adding the modern world.  The Santa Clause 2 is not a surprise; it is exactly what I’d expect from a sequel.  It isn’t a bad film, but everything is stale.  The jokes have been done before.  Like most sequels, it is overstuffed with underdeveloped plotlines and unnecessary extra characters.  Is there a studio executive somewhere  who just repeats “It’s a sequel, so put it more stuff; it doesn’t matter what the stuff is, just add more of it?”  So, they gave us a story of Calvin’s son being “naughty” to impress a girl.  Nothing comes of it (the girl fades out of the picture) and after whining about how tough it is to be the son of Santa Claus (yes, I’m not making that up), he’s fine.  The other plots involve an artificial Santa that decides all children are naughty, and Scott’s search for a wife.  The romance section works the best as Elizabeth Mitchell—as the stern but caring principal—is as close to an interesting character as this film can produce.  But the jump from first date to love is way too sudden.  The real disappointment is the end, where all the problems are solved by uninspired action and a poorly done chase.  There are a few laughs, and a touch of the Christmas spirit, but not enough to make watching The Santa Clause 2  a yearly ritual.

 Christmas, Reviews Tagged with:
Oct 082002
 
toxic

David Carver (Dean Cain) becomes the new security officer at a secret underground cloning laboratory on the day they splice together ancient DNA to make a dragon.  The dragon grows to full size in a few hours, breaks free, and begins eating the scientists.  Trapped far below ground, Carver searches for a way to save himself and the others.  To complicate matters, the lead scientist will do anything to keep the result of his work alive.

Even the filmmakers knew this was a disaster.  In editing, they noticed that the shots they had were too boring to cut together in a normal fashion, so they attempted to save the film by using the always questionable technique of split screens.  Yes, we get to see two scenes on the screen at the same time.  Wow.  And often, they are the same scene from a different angle.  At one point there were six separate pictures on the screen, and none of them were worth seeing.  We can see one person glancing at a screen while another stands idly and others look worried.  Now that’s worth multiple views.  I applaud them trying any crazy technique they could think of to do something with their wasted film stock, since it was too late to ruin it.  After all, it is good to be innovative.  But then painting each frame with a big pink “X” would have been every bit as innovative and about as effective in turning this into a watchable film.  Hint to all filmmakers:  adding split screens will never save your failings, and will almost always destroy your successes.

To go with the split screens, there are also onscreen dossiers that pop up when we see each new character, but disappear too quickly to read.  And in two cases, we’re given place and date stamps.  One, which informs anyone too brain dead to figure it out that helicopters land at helipads and light outside means it is day, states “HELIPAD-DAY” and sits there long enough for you to run and get a pad of paper and a pencil so you can note down this fascinating piece of data.

“Hey, George.  Did you know that there whirly-o-bird is settin’ down on something called a helipad.  It seez so right on the TV.”

“Woooeeee, that is convenient.   If we only knew when it was a’doin’ that.”

“Why, it’s doin’ it in the day.”

I do love helpful filmmakers.  However, they forgot about this feature for most of the film.  There were no little signs saying “HALLWAY NEAR REC ROOM-STILL DAY.”  Without that, how am I to know?

I’ve skipped analyzing the story, but why bother?  It is filled with plot-holes, improbable events, inconsistent characters carrying out nonsensical actions, and of course, a mad scientist.  The dialog consist mainly of bickering and the occasional unsupported rant for or against cloning.  For production values, think small, often reused, generic, underground set.  I’ve seen worse dragons than this small, cartoony CGI one, but not in a feature in the last twenty years.

Back to Mad ScientistsBack to Giant Monsters

Oct 062002
 
one reel

Poor boy Jeff Allen (William Gregory Lee) comes to the big city to fulfill his dream of becoming a stockbroker.  With the help of a bartender, Annabella (Elisa Donovan), he gets a interview with Dyson Keller (Eric Roberts) of Wolf Brothers and soon is on his way to becoming a success.  But his relationship with Annabella begins to create conflicts with his boss, who wants him to be nothing but a member of the pack.

David DeCoteau confuses me.  He makes films that don’t seem to be for anyone, nor do they have consistent direction or tone.  He tosses everything into his films as if that will appeal to the fans of those divergent elements.  But the parts all conflict.

So, this time he’s made a business flick with lots and lots of dialog.  It’s also a werewolf film, with, well, lots and lots of talking.  It’s got a little of DeCoteau’s usual homoeroticism, but all those buff males keep chasing females.  It’s a message picture about what greed can turn you into, except that all vanishes long before the end.

The idea of lycanthropy as a metaphor for greed isn’t a bad one.  The predatory businessman as beast was used successfully in Wolf.  But there needs to be some action and horror elements or there’s nothing to act as a symbol.  It also would be nice if the werewolves became werewolves at some point.  Wolves of Wall Street gives us guys with a little white makeup lit with blue.  They do growl a bit and bite people, but it’s just not that impressive.  Perhaps there’s a way to make a werewolf film without the werewolves, but at this point, that method is still a mystery.

DeCoteau does fill the movie with good looking men, who dress extremely well.  They also wear matching underwear and all get undressed together at a company party.  Once you’ve got a bunch of muscled young men in briefs crawling across the floor together, I’m not sure why you don’t take the minute step and actually have a homosexual relationship in the flick.

Perhaps I missed the point of the film.  Maybe the whole thing is supposed to be a tease.  We’re teased that there will be meaning.  We’re teased with the horror of werewolves.  We’re teased with gay sex.  But I’ve never liked being teased.  I prefer to actually get what is suggested.  If Wolves of Wall Street delivered, then the people who like what it is offering could watch the film and enjoy it.  In its current state, I can’t imagine anyone taking pleasure in it.

DeCoteau also directed the even more confusing Ring of Darkness.

 Reviews, Werewolves Tagged with:
Oct 062002
 
one reel

Colum Kennedy (Allen Scotti) brings his wife, Stella (Jennifer Courtney), and children to the rural Irish village where he was born in order to write a book.  He quickly discovers that the town is filled with shape shifters who mainly take the form of Irish wolfhounds.  A beautiful blonde (Julie Cialini), who watches Colum in the shape of a white dog, seduces him, showing him his heritage.

A weredog film is a questionable idea to begin with, but it completely collapses under the weight of its own silliness when the dogs in question are Irish wolfhounds.  Sure, they’re big enough, but they don’t have that sinister feeling.  I didn’t want to run from them; I wanted to brush them.

Financed with the help of the Irish government (I’d love to have been in on those meetings), the setting is pleasant, if unspectacular.  I kept waiting for a scene that would make full use of the landscape, but as neither director nor cinematographer demonstrated any proficiency with a camera, I should have expected less.

I wonder what the original plan was.  My guess is they approached the Irish with the idea for a folktale-based thriller, but once they started shooting, found they lacked the writing, acting, and filming talent to make that work.  So, they added a few sex scenes, courtesy of Playboy Playmate Cialini.  But it is far too little to convert Wolfhound into an erotic thriller or softcore.  Most of the film’s running time is spent with Colum staring off as if he’s lost his place in the script, and with Stella yapping.

Cialini sounds as Irish as I do (and I live in Georgia) and couldn’t star in a grammar school production, but then she wasn’t hired for her acting.  Her breasts are her ticket.  So what excuse was there for casting Allen Scotti and Jennifer Courtney?  They are little better than Cialini while being twice as annoying.

With the exception of a few of the supporting female players, Wolfhound is an amateur production from beginning to end.  If you are looking for horror or fantasy, suspense, or eroticism, look somewhere else.

 Reviews, Werewolves Tagged with:
Oct 052002
 
two reels

Julia Lund (Laura Regan), a psychology student, is called to meet a childhood friend at night. He tells her that monsters from their childhood, that come out of the darkness, are coming for him, and then kills himself.  Billy had night terrors as a child, as did Julia and two of Billy’s friends. She begins to suspect that “They” are real and coming for her.

They grabbed me with its first scene of childhood fear. It was a bit long, didn’t lead to much, but was well done with some creeps below the surface. And, with less intensity, that’s what I felt about the rest of the film. The monsters, CGI creations, pop up only for seconds in dimly lit rooms or nighttime roads.  That’s good for suspense, but bad for thrills, so there better be a lot of suspense. Well, there’s some, and it’s well done, with some creeps…ummm… Just go back and read my second sentence.

Laura Regan and the rest of the cast look good and give personality to their characters. Regan has a future in horror films as she can pull off intelligent, strong, and scared out of her wits all at once. A bit more of that fear, and a bit less of the psychology discussions or endless doubts about her sanity would have helped.

There was so much potential here, but I was left feeling that none of it mattered. Things happen (and looked good), and then the credits ran. Perhaps with a bit more buildup for the ending it might have been memorable.

Now, dear readers, I want to talk to you about sexuality and nudity. These are good thing all by themselves but serve an additional purpose in horror and thrillers. In these films, viewers needs to have their blood racing and their adrenaline flowing. What’s fun is that if you get a person excited in one manner, it transfers over to others. Thus, a bit of nudity can get the viewer breathing hard so that sudden murder is that much more intense.  With that in mind, They offers up Julia in a bath and getting out of bed naked after sex. The problem is the camera is aimed to show nothing. No flesh, no titillation, no excitement. Fine. There are other ways to get excitement. But then why were these scenes in the film?  What is the point? Did director Robert Harmon have some extra film in a camera and realize the movie was too short? Worse, there is a scene of a girl taking a shower in her bathing suit. There’s two ways to go with that—show her naked in the shower, or don’t have a shower scene. We all know that girls bathe from time to time so it’s not necessary for character development.

The film is alternately titled Wes Craven Presents They. This is a marketing ploy as Craven had nothing to do with this film (well, he might have watched it and I’m sure he got a few bucks for his name). So, the studio/producers think their potential audience is so stupid that sticking an unconnected horror icon’s name on a film will cause the fools to come running. Since “presented by” or something similar is popping up on more and more films, my question is, are they right?

Back to Demons

 Demons, Reviews Tagged with:
Oct 052002
 
toxic

Kirsty (Ashley Laurence), who confronted Pinhead (Doug Bradley) and his demonic Cenobites in the first two Hellraiser film, returns briefly, now with a husband, Trevor (Dean Winters), only to disappear when the car they are in plunges into a river. The police suspect Trevor of killing his wife, and Trevor has no idea what happened, particularly when reality starts sliding away.

Quick Review: Yet another film that has the Hellraiser name, but little else. This is the same movie as Hellraiser: Inferno, but with a less unpleasant lead. Ashley Laurence is back as Kirsty to try and convince fans that this is the old Hellraiser again, but it’s just marketing. There’s nothing new here, nothing of interest. Being slightly better than the previous sequel is hardly impressive.

What we get is a series of events, where some kind of violence or demonic activity occurs, only for Trevor to wake, finding it was all a dream, or a hallucination. Sometimes we have him waking up after he has already awoken. Wow, dreams within dreams, is there a cheaper film trick? This means nothing that happens has any relevance. All these non-events are supposed to be deep, showing us that Trevor isn’t a nice guy, which we already know.

No series has faller farther. Hellraiser was an innovative, twisted bit of filmmaking that stands up today as one of the great horror films. With the return of Kirsty there was the opportunity to make something that could be entertaining at least on a nostalgic level. But even that was tossed away.

The other films in the series are: Hellraiser, Hellbound: Hellraiser II, Hellraiser III: Hell on Earth, Hellraiser: Bloodline, Hellraiser: Inferno, Hellraiser: Deader, Hellraiser: Hellworld.

Back to Demons

 Demons, Reviews Tagged with:
Oct 052002
 
two reels

Five hundred years ago, a samurai summoned the demon Kodeni (Santi Sudaros) to save his clan, but afterwards, the demon entered his daughter to be born as a superhuman. Now, Kodeni needs a new body, so chooses Akemi (Maï Anh Le), the daughter of Commissioner Fujiwara (Yasuaki Kurata) to be his mother. Fujiwara is visited by the ghost of the samurai who tells him he must kill his daughter.  He travels to France to do that, but she is now protected by Marco (Cyril Mourali) and his irritating sidekick Nadir (Saïd Serrari). There is also a video game that… OK, there is no way to make any sense of the video game.

Samouraïs is a cinematic argument for the French and Japanese never working together.  Both cultures have a tendency toward annoying sidekicks that are supposed to be funny, but never even reach childishly stupid. Put the two together, and they can create a character that will rot your brain, not to mention destroy any film. The character in this case is Nadir, and he may be the most unpleasant person to watch that’s ever appeared on celluloid. He’s a jive-talking, cowardly white dude that swears a lot, but I can’t say why. Nor can I explain most of his dialog except to speculate that a random word generator was involved. I’ve been told he is a less-subtle version of Screech from Saved by the Bell, a statement that makes me very happy I never watched Saved by the Bell.

Minus Nadir, there are the makings of an entertaining action film here, although having the parts doesn’t mean they are put together correctly, nor that there aren’t a few items that don’t belong. The fights, and they are numerous, are above average for Japanese martial arts flicks. The villains’ abilities are inconsistent (sometimes managing impressive wire-kicks, and sometimes acting as average thugs), but that’s par for the genre. Santi Sudaros is an impressive-looking adversary, towering over his opponents and bringing new meaning to “buff.” I can’t say I’m a big fan of faux-teen, pretty-boy martial artists that have been appearing in more and more films, but Cyril Mourali is a notch above the norm. His acting isn’t painful to watch, and he has the moves. Maï Anh Le (as the pretty-girl martial artist) is more to my tastes and looks good knocking anonymous demon henchman into walls.  Unfortunately, she doesn’t do enough of that due to her demonic pregnancy, spending a substantial portion of the picture huffing and puffing and holding her suddenly enlarged stomach. The most exciting scenes belong to Yasuaki Kurata, who brings classic style to the proceedings. His night stick versus katana smash’em up in an airport washroom is the high point of the movie. With all the punches, kicks, and sword swings, the filmmakers forgot this was a supernatural film. I would have liked some less mundane combat. For a movie with a demon, there’s too many human against human moments.

In between fights, when Nadir isn’t onscreen, it’s a mixed bag. The romance is believable, but is too abrupt.  Fujiwara shows genuine concern for his daughter and the situation, but is convinced to murder his child rather easily. In order to make sense of anything (and allow large chunks of time for embarrassing Nadir moments), everyone is far too enthusiastic about explaining things. The demon tells his own followers information they would already know (but we don’t), and goes out of his way to point out to the Commissioner that he is a demon and is going to be reborn in his daughter. If he’d just kept his mouth shut, he would have won without a struggle.

The ending brings in Cyberpunk video game moments that have nothing to do with the rest of the film. It’s as if two scripts were merged, taking the climax of a bad, preteen, science fiction flick and pasting it on an action fantasy.

The one laugh is unintentional, and due to ratings and censorship that are a plague everywhere in the world. Here, they cause a woman to give birth to a demon that’s wearing pants. They are little leather pants, but pants none-the-less, and they grow as he does. Later, the demon has sex with Akemi, and he’s still wearing those pants.  I guess the true power of a demon is to shoot through tight, black shorts.

Back to Demons

Oct 052002
 
two reels

In the near future, weapon maker Spencer Olham (Gary Sinise) is accused of being an alien android with an implanted bomb.  The oppressive government has no conclusive test to determine if he is an android, as he wouldn’t know himself, so orders him executed.  Olham escapes to prove who he really is.

Based on a short story by Philip K. Dick (who’s works are also the basis for Blade Runner, Total Recall, and Minority Report), I have to wonder if it isn’t time to find a new author to pilfer.  The story has androids and uncertain identity and a man, claiming his innocence, being chased by an obsessed agent.  That’s what you’d get by combining the three other movies I listed.  It’s not a bad story, but I’ve seen it too many times.  Gary Sinise has no problem with the part of a scientist in trouble, though it’s a bit hard believing him in the fight scenes (or believing in his character at those times; where exactly are all these movie scientists getting combat training?).

The world of Impostor is high quality, futuristic noir, for the few scenes we’re shown.  But most of the time is spent in sewers, hospital corridors, sparse forests, and any other place they could think of that would be dark.  Hey, how about a crawl space?  Or, he could just be stuck under a table.  Give the poor guy some light!

Originally filmed as one third of an anthology (I’ve gotten contradictory reports on what the other two parts were) and enlarged to a feature when studio execs liked what they saw, Impostor works better in the shortened form.  Half the film feels like padding.  Olham is chased here and there (always in dark places) and none of it is interesting.  Impostor is not an action film, and they shouldn’t have tried to make it one.

 Cyberpunk, Reviews Tagged with:
Oct 042002
 
one reel

A man who may be Elvis (Bruce Campbell) joins up with one who almost certainly isn’t JFK (Ossie Davis) to save the inhabitants of their Texas nursing home from a soul-sucking mummy.

How to make a cult film:
1—Start with a zany idea;
2—Add cultural references and in-jokes;
3—Put in some overly-serious, angst-filled revelations from the protagonist;
4—Get a star of other cult films;
5—Sprinkle liberally with genre icons;
6—Spice with camp as needed.
And there you have it, a…hmmmm…  Well, maybe not.  Director Don Coscarelli tried so hard to make a cult film, but those aren’t made, they just happen.  And it doesn’t happen with Bubba Ho-tep.

Not that the picture isn’t original or that there aren’t plenty of clever moments (such as JFK explaining that LBJ had him removed and dyed black so no one would suspect), but there are far more bland stretches and repetition.  For its small budget, the mummy and FX are satisfying.  But this isn’t a horror film, or a fun monster mystery; it is a slow, stretched-to-breaking, essay on the elderly.  Based on a short story, the plot would fill about a half hour.  The rest is Elvis bemoaning his situation, cursing his life and those that treat him poorly, waxing philosophic on the nature of aging, and wondering what might have been.  Effective in pointing out the depressing way our culture treats the aged?  Yes.  Entertaining?  No.  Perhaps Coscarelli should have made a documentary on nursing home life as that appears to be his concern.  Such a film might be meaningful and useful and help people to change society.  I urge him to do this, now, and leave the narrative features to someone else.

 Mummies, Reviews Tagged with:
Oct 032002
 
four reels

After the computer kills all the members of an underground lab, amnesiac Alice (Milla Jovovich) and a team of  special agents must enter the lab to shut down the computer and figure out what happened.  Along the way, there are zombies, genetically altered monsters, a virus, and traitors.

Quick Review: One in a string of glittsy, substance-low monster films (along with The Mummy ’99, Underworld and Van Hellsing) Resident Evil may be empty, but it is still a lot of fun.  It avoids being a tired sub-genre film by being so many sub-genres at once.  It’s a zombie film, a creature feature, a disaster film, a spy movie, an escape film, a sci-fi evil computer picture, an anti-corporate diatribe, and a disease flick.  And more than any of those, it’s an adventure movie.  What’s surprising is that they are all done right.  The pacing is nearly perfect, keeping things always moving, but never too fast to miss plot points or character development.  The music keeps the tension high.  The fights are exciting.  And I found myself caring about Alice.  It doesn’t hurt that she’s played by Milla Jovovich who looks stunning and moves like a cat.  But then, the entire film looks good.  It’s worth watching once just to study the colors.  No one will be discussing philosophy after watching Resident Evil, but sometimes, that’s OK.  You will be entertained.

Followed by Resident Evil: Apocalypse.

Back to Zombies