Dec 222017
  December 22, 2017

Ranking the Star Wars films gives me a chance to rate them without writing full reviews. Iā€™ve always wanted them listed on my siteā€”to show where they fit with other F&SF films, but thought it was a bit silly to fully review the first six. The overlap between ā€œPeople who do not already have a strong view on Star Wars I-VIā€ and ā€œPeople who read my web siteā€ is zero. Here I can just quickly state my feelings on the earlier films without bothering to go into details that no one cares about. So, starting with #11

 

#11 The Rise of the SkywalkerĀ two reels

We start from scratch with new villains, a new threat, a new big bad, new allies, a new quest, and new histories. By ā€œnewā€ I mean re-purposed from earlier Star Wars movies, but theyā€™re not the ones from the last two films. The Last Jedi is mostly retconned out of existence as director J.J. Abrams replaces it with “borrowed” material. He starts with a copy of Return of the Jedi and then just jams in anything he can find. There are multiple characters who exist in this film only because they existed in earlier films. We have repeated action scenes, repeated locations, and a repeated finale, all of which exist only to point to those previous versions.

For a good portion of the runtime, its three friends off on adventures, which is pleasant, if overly familiar, like an adventure serial. It’s given some emotional force by the relationship between Rey and Kylo Ren. Whatever heart and depth the film has is with them. Of course, it all looks and sounds great. And unlike the first six films in the series, the acting isnā€™t a detriment. Itā€™s cheap, lowest common denominator fun that I’ve seen too many times before. The Last JediĀ tried to be more. The Rise of Skywalker puts in real effort to be less. (Full Review)

 

#10 The Phantom MenaceĀ two reels

Here is the beginning of a backstory we never asked for and never should have been given. Even good movies detailing Darth Vaderā€™s history would have damaged the character and the original films, and these were not good movies. What is good about this entry? It is a very pretty film with great art design and costume design. And Ewan McGregor does the best job of acting of anyone in the first six films. The score is excellent and thereā€™s one good lightsaber fight.

The bad? Everything else. The Jedi are idiots for no reason, with Qui-Gon Jinn being the icon for stupidity. Heā€™s never right. No one besides McGregor can act, with Natalie Portman particularly bad. Then thereā€™s Antisemitism, racist Asian characters, young Anakin, Shmi, immaculate conception, and the never-ending pod race. Even things that at first seem like they will be good are a mess. Darth Maul seemed ā€œcool,ā€ at least in the advertising, but in the actual movie, he is a void. He is given no personality at all. He is just some guy with a different kind of lightsaber. Thatā€™s his character. And of course, thereā€™s Jar-Jar, who is not funny nor dramatic nor interesting. The general defense is that heā€™s ā€œFor the children,ā€ but thatā€™s insulting to children.

 

#9 Revenge Of The SithĀ two reels

The biggest mistake of Revenge of the Sith is making it so self-serious. It wants to be a Shakespeare tragedy, which is odd for a series based on afternoon serials. The second biggest was Hayden Christensen. Granted, the actor never had a chance, But Ewan McGregor managed to elevate his poor dialog while Christensen drags it down from horrendous into a deep, dark pit. He is so relentlessly bad that it is almost some kind of weird victory. How could he have managed this level of ineptitude? No moment with Christensen/Anakin is good, and you canā€™t escape him. Of all the prequel films, this is the one truly about Anakin, which makes it even worse as his arc is constructed so poorly. Nothing about his character is human. People do not act this way, and his sudden (and it is ridiculously sudden) switch to being a villain comes off as funny. But thatā€™s not the only unintentionally humorous moment. Killing children shouldnā€™t be a laugh-riot, but thereā€™s no other way to take it.

Does this film have anything? Well, again, it looks good. The music is good. And all the lightsaber battles are nicely choreographedā€”even if the one that is supposed to be dramatic has that stupid ā€œIā€™ve got the higher groundā€ moment.

 

#8 Solo: A Star Wars StoryĀ three reels

Solo: A Star Wars Story exists to answer questions I wasnā€™t interested in having answered or specifically wanted to remain unanswered. Where did Han and Chewbacca meet? Where did Han get his trademark gun? What was the Kessel run like? How did the card game that got him the Milenum Falcon play out? If you were curious about any of these, then Solo is intended for you. I was not curious.

Solo avoids the lows of previous installments, but also never hits the highs. The basic story of a failed heist leading to a bigger heist and people and groups not being what they originally appeared is a workable foundation for a film. My only complaint with the movie they made is that the cinematography is too dark.

Of course the real problem is that this isnā€™t the movie they should have made. Phil Lord and Chris Miller were planning on making a comedy, but executives got scared and brought in workman director Ron Howard to make a safer film. The failure of Solo is in imagination. It takes no risks. It sits comfortably within the Star Wars canon.Ā It was tailor-made for the fanboys who were upset that The Last Jedi wasnā€™t exactly what they imagined when they were six. You should never give the fans what they want, and more often than not, they will decide they didnā€™t really want it after all. (Full Review)

 

#7 Attack Of The ClonesĀ three reels

This film has a vast advantage over the other two prequel films: it has parallel stories. The Anakin stuff is again pretty bad, with Christensen putting in a career-mutilating performance as he and Natalie Portman utter uncomfortable ā€œromanticā€ dialog. But with this film, if we removed the bad material, thereā€™s still something left. Obi-Wan has his own quest with no Anakin in sight and that stuff is all pretty good. There are huge swaths of the film that arenā€™t embarrassing, which is a triumph for a prequel film. It also helps that segments near the beginning and at the end that do involve Anakin are large ensemble action scenes, thus he canā€™t completely destroy those. Yes, every time Christensen says anything ā€œdramaticā€ it is cringe-worthy, but we aren’t stuck with him, and when we’re off on the water planet, I can just sit back and enjoy the movie. And as an added plus, there is Yoda with a lightsaber; when he broke that out, the entire theater cheered.

I also have a better view of this film than others because of how I first saw it. In 2002, IMAX films were shown on 2-hour reels and often if a film went over 2 hours, they would cut it. So my first viewing of Attack of the Clones was an IMAX version with 20 minutes cutā€”and they did a good job of cutting. It was 20 minutes less of Anakin. If I was ranking just that version, Iā€™d move it up at least one place. That shows that this film, unlike The Phantom Menace and Revenge Of The Sith, is still salvageable. A good fan edit turns it into a very good film.

 

#6 Return Of The JediĀ three reels

This film is a lot of fun, no question. I enjoyed it when I first saw it and still do. That doesnā€™t mean it isnā€™t a disaster, just an enjoyable disaster. The problems really start with the acting. Yes, all the first six films have poor acting but among the original trilogy, it stands out here. This is partly due to the actorsā€™ displeasure with the script. Harrison Ford wanted Han to die and when not only did he not, but he was forced to say sub-par dialog, Ford tossed in the towel. He wasnā€™t trying, and it shows. The rest of the cast isnā€™t good either. Thereā€™s also the repeated plot elements (another Death Star and another run of little ships to blow it up) and the Ewoks. Thereā€™s no getting around those teddy bears; they could have been cute or transgressive (if made vicious), but instead they scream out Mattel. By this time it was clear that much of the films were about selling merchandise, but couldnā€™t it have been done inconspicuously? Even things that would have been good in the first film were feeling old by now. The cycle chase is a bore, and Iā€™ve already mentioned the final space battle. And no, they did not ā€œalways knowā€ that Leia was Lukeā€™s sister (a reveal that does not bear up to scrutiny). Itā€™s a clunky retcon.

So whatā€™s good? As always for the franchise, it looks good. Weā€™re given the iconic Slave Leia that gets a bonus with the strangulation scene. The final lightsaber duel is excellent (though that is interrupted by the Emperorā€”heā€™d have won if he just shut up). And thatā€™s about it.

 

#5 The Force AwakensĀ 3,5 reels

Star Wars 7 is a construction more than a film, made up of pieces from the other six films (mainly the original three and primarily A New Hope). Itā€™s all homages and repeats. Itā€™s well done, with every aspect meticulously crafted. We may have seen it all before, but the new paint looks good. The actors do better than under Lucasā€™s care, and so do the characters. It supplies exactly what the audience asked for. I donā€™t believe art involves supplying just what an audience asks for. Thatā€™s the job of hucksters and conmen. This is the finest movie you are likely to see that demonstrates the emptiness of the blockbuster business. It’s a bullseye on a low target. Itā€™s hollow corporate fun. It would have never created a legend, but it can live off of one.

 

#4 Rogue OneĀ four reels

The narrative stumbles in the first half, with time wasted on needless travelogues and meeting characters of no importance, while we are distracted by obvious call-backs to earlier films. Re-watching Rogue One, the first hour comes off even worse than on first viewing.

Then it turns it all around. Suddenly it knows its direct kin: The Dirty Dozen, Where Eagles Dare, and The Guns of Navarone, with behind-enemy-lines skirmishes and a few actions that would keep our protagonists out of polite society. This isnā€™t the heroism of special folks, but of soldiers in a war, that comes with hard choices, violence, and real sacrifice, and it makes for the most satisfying Star Wars film since 1977. The ending makes sitting through the failings of the first act worthwhile. This isnā€™t the film to bring the magic back to the Star Wars franchise, but it is the one to bring back meaning and emotion, and thatā€™s better. (Full Review)

 

#3 The Empire Strikes BackĀ four reels

Note: For those grabbing torches and pitchforks, I am givingĀ EmpireĀ a good rating. I know here is where people will get upset with me as many want to rankĀ EmpireĀ as #1, but it just doesnā€™t belong there. Yes, the cinematography is a little better, but it was good in Star Wars {A New Hope}. Yes, the acting has improved, but it still isnā€™t that good. And the SFXs might be a touch better, but thatā€™s insignificant and they were a wonder already in the first film. And I do not give it points for introducing Boba Fett. Why does anyone care about some tertiary character with a so-so costume?

Sure,Ā EmpireĀ has some great battle scenes. It also has one of my favorite lightsaber duels. And while character development is shaky and nothing deep is delivered, it isnā€™t embarrassing either. This is a good film; I donā€™t think I need to convince anyone of that.
But it has some problems. First, itā€™s a bridge film. It has no plot, but is only a couple chapters in the larger story. It starts nowhere and ends nowhere. Then there is the reveal where the response is unearned. The only reason anyone thinks it is a big deal that Vader is Lukeā€™s father is if they themselves would find this a big deal in their own life. The film does nothing to sell this. Why does Luke care? Why does he scream out in that pathetic way? If Aunt Beru had been Vader, I can see why that would have had some emotional resonance; he knew her. Luke is a whiny kid with daddy issues, but that isnā€™t enough to explain it, nor is it a good thing that our hero turns out to be more of a child here than when we started with him. But besides the film not making this moment important, it has the effect of shrinking the universe as well as shifting the message. In A New Hope, the universe is vast and anyone could become a hero. Now everyone you run into is family and the saga has shifted to being one of royalty and chosen ones. It would be a very long time before this failing was repaired.

 

#2 The Last JediĀ four reels

starwars8

As The Force Awakens was a remake of Star Wars {A New Hope}, The Last Jedi is a remake of The Empire Strikes Back, but it is a cleverly made, artistically constructed, updated and upgraded remake. It is shocking how the same this movie is while managing to feel really different.

Rey, Poe, and Finn have previously hidden depth. And Kylo Ren is significantly less annoying, no longer appearing to be whining Anaken 2.0. Rose is a nice addition, carrying half the theme. And Luke finally comes into his own as a character.

The Last Jedi has humor without ever getting campy, and cute critters that donā€™t get on my nerves (like Ewoksā€¦). And damn is it pretty. There are some sets (the throne room) and some shots (overhead of the speeders on the salt planet) that are magnificent. Plus, as the most layered Star Wars film, it finally undoes the damage of Empire by stepping away from the elite nobles and special chosen ones that have infested the franchise for too long. Finally, we are not in the saga of one family, but in a universe where heroism doesnā€™t depend on blood. (Full Review)

 

#1 Star Wars {A New Hope}Ā five reels

It all started here. It was all new. Iā€™d never seen anything like this before and it was breathtaking. The first scene, with the rebel ship flying overhead followed by the star destroyer, is amazing and has never been equaled. Star Wars took old stories and myths and icons, tossed them into a sandy blender, and came up with something new. It isnā€™t perfect. The acting isā€¦rough, and the dialog is rougher. Luke is an annoying git and the emotional states of the characters donā€™t hold up under inspection. But all is forgiven here. The later films donā€™t get a pass on their weaknesses, but being first counts. No one had seen a lightsaber before and theyā€™ve never been as good. The Death Star was incredible (Death Stars 2 & 3 were not). Darth Vader was a forceful and scary villain; simply due to familiarity, he could never manage this again. Star Wars is exciting and beautiful and opens up alien worlds and a galaxy far, far away. It could only be done once, and once is enough.