Peter still canāt deal with his life and has a three-year-oldās grasp on relationships. Harry is still terrible. Mary Jane is still around to be saved (three times again) and still cheating on whatever boyfriend she currently has. The villain of the week is Doc Ock (Alfred Molina).
Spider-Man was serious! So, since sequels have to ratchet up everything, Spider-Man 2 ratchets up the self-importance. Peter whines, āWhat am I supposed to do?ā and I am supposed to feel sorry for him. I donāt. His problems are epic if you are a child. For anyone not a child, āgrow upā is the proper response.
The romance, again, has the maturity of a young teenās view of the world. I hope that no adult takes any of this as accurate or they are doomed to a very sad life. And to go with that silliness, Peterās teen angst now has a literal representation in his failing powers. It is not subtle, but then childrenās films rarely are.
Harry has changed from the first film, delving into slimy James Franco mode, which makes him a bit less boring although no more enjoyable. Later he becomes nasty, and thatās beyond Francoās ability to pull off. Molina steps in as the new cartoon villain, but he does it with as much heart as the trilogy allows. Whether that is an improvement or not depends on how arch you like your evil-doers. That he really is stoppable by anyone with a gun does make his campaign of crime harder to buy than the Goblinās. After all, Aunt May messes him up. But yeah, Iāll call him an upgrade.
Once again , the CGI is less than it should be (with a fight on the side of a building standing out). The big set piece combat on a train isnāt bad (though it so overpowers Spider-Man that Doc Ock should have been dead from one punch), and has the trilogyās only truly emotional moment, but Iāve become spoiled and it wouldnāt rank in the top thirty superhero fights now, and thatās all Spiderman 2 has to offer.
Reviewing Spider-Man 2 is pointless after writing one forĀ Spider-Man. They are the same. Not that the first had any claim to originality, but this level of copying is extreme even for sequels. The villain is a touch better and the preaching is even more annoying (yes, yes, be a hero), but otherwise, weāve seen it all before.
And as a big fan of The Importance of Being Earnest, I find it irritating that Mary Janeās version apparently starts late in the second act.