Feb 041947
 
two reels

Capt. Rip Murdock (Humphrey Bogart) and his buddy Sgt Johnny Drake (William Prince) are headed to Washington DC to receive a pair of medals when Johnny jumps a different train to avoid the publicity. Rip follows and quickly discovers Johnny had enlisted under a false name as he was on the run from a murderer rap. Johnny ends up dead and Rip decides to find out who did it and why. His leads are Johnny’s girl, Dusty Chandler (Lizabeth Scott), local criminal boss Martinelli (Morris Carnovsky), and a hulking thug (Marvin Miller).

It’s like clever kids stole the contract of the best Film Noir actor of all time, so decided to make a movie. Adults couldn’t have made the choices on screen. It is amazing how many wrong turns this thing takes.

OK, Dead Reckoning has Humphrey Bogart, and this isn’t uncertain or undeveloped Bogart. This is Bogart at the height of his career being asked to be Bogart. There’s no way that isn’t going to be worth a look. But from there, it all goes haywire. The plot is made up of pieces from other Noirs without any regard for how they fit together. Elements are pulled from Double Indemnity, Murder My Sweet, Gilda, The Big Sleep, and, The Maltese Falcon—in that final case, with “borrowed” dialog. There’s a love triangle involving a casino owner, but it is vague and impossible to figure how it is supposed to work. Rip falls for the girl when it makes no sense to. He gets knocked out (twice) at the wrong times and for the wrong reasons. He tells the story as a flashback, but the flashback ends two-thirds of the way through—and the character he was speaking to vanishes from the picture. Police come and go willy nilly throughout.

There are five writers and I wonder if they ever interacted. The flashback begins with all sorts of stuff about Rip and Johnny having been wounded and traveling to get their medals, etc. Why? Why doesn’t the film start with Rip showing up in town and finding his friend dead? That’s clearly the beginning. But then Rip himself makes no sense. Outside of a tendency to bend the rules, he appears to be an upstanding guy who owned a taxi company (that was somehow destroyed by Pearl Harber…?). OK. Great. So he’s a normal, good guy with military and business skills. But when needed for the “plot,” he’s suddenly best friends with “good” mobsters who can get him in touch with a friendly safecracker—one who has retired but is instantly loyal to Rip and who happens to have napalm grenades and all the guns anyone could need. Rip, the mob boss, and Dusty all have “plans” but none of them are coherent and it is laughable that even they’d think they would work

And that’s just the start of the nonsense. There’s no getting around how derivative Dead Reckoning is, but a good deal of the foolishness could have been forgiven if the characters worked. After all, The Big Sleep didn’t make much sense (although the characters did) and it is a masterpiece. But then the leads would need chemistry and there is none. I put that on Scott, who is some kind of lifeless doll-thing. I think she was trying to do a Lauren Bacall imitation, assuming she was human and so, could have intentions. She’s a beautiful woman, but I don’t believe for a minute that all these men would fall for her. Or that she is a living being.

I’m not sure if I laughed more at the stolen dialog (“When a guy’s pal is killed, he ought to do something”) or the newly written gibberish. There’s this weird conversation that is supposed to be playful, romantic banter but is just bizarre:

“I’ve been thinking: women ought to come capsule-sized, about four inches high. When a man goes out of an evening, he just puts her in his pocket and takes her along with him, and that way he knows exactly where she is. He gets to his favorite restaurant, he puts her on the table and lets her run around among the coffee cups while he swaps a few lies with his pals… Without danger of interruption. And when it comes that time of the evening when he wants her full-sized and beautiful, he just waves his hand and there she is, full-sized.”

So, there’s that.

Dead Reckoning is shot well. Nothing is outstanding, but overall the crew all knew their jobs. And this is Bogart, so I have to say see it, but don’t spend your nickels.

 Film Noir, Reviews Tagged with: