Oct 112001
 
two reels

Grace (Nicole Kidman) and her two children live in a secluded, always darkened house which may be haunted. The arrival of three mysterious servants mark an increase in ghostly activity, and indicate that there is a secret that Grace is not ready to hear.

Quick Review: There is no questioning the skill of everyone who worked on this film. It is competent in every way. Acting, cinematography, lighting, music, set design, sound, costuming—it’s all first rate. Nicole Kidman is particularly strong as a woman broken by the absence of her husband and controlled by her fears. But it’s not enough. This is an old-fashioned ghost story, with creaking boards and mysterious piano playing and plenty of suspense, but that can only go on for so long. How many times is it interesting to watch Grace open a door to find nothing on the other side? I got it. There are ghosts. I got it a long time before Grace did. When something finally happens, it’s far too late. The secret that dominates the end of the film is exactly where the story needed to go, though it is no great surprise. This is an excellent 30 minute movie dragged out to 100 minutes.

 Ghost Stories, Reviews Tagged with:
Oct 112001
 
four reels

Michi turns up at Taguchi’s apartment to pick up a computer disk and to make sure he’s OK.  Since he hangs himself, it’s clear he wasn’t OK.  Another friend gets the disk, and then he begins to act strangely too.  Meanwhile, Kawashima, a university student, is setting up his first computer.  He’s frightened when it connects to the internet without his assistance and brings up a site that asks, “Would you like to meet a ghost?” and then shows videos of zombie-like people.  Michi and Kawashima notice friends and strangers disappearing or committing suicide and begin to see ghosts in the real world.  All they can do is try and keep their loved-ones alive.

Pulse is not what it seems to be, from the cover, advertisements, or even the first twenty minutes.  It appears to be a Ringu clone, with a cursed computer disk standing in for the cursed tape.  The first person with the disk dies in a bizarre manner and it’s clear to the viewer that a ghost is involved.  The next person with the disk is effected while an unrelated person with a computer also runs into ghost problems.  Sounds like  Ringu.  But then it all changes.  Not only does it turn out that we had the rules wrong (the disk is of no importance), but Pulse isn’t even a horror movie.  It is an art-house discourse on existentialism, with J-horror trappings.  It isn’t scary; it’s depressing…in as good a way as “depressing” can be.  I don’t normally think of depressing as a positive thing in film, but there are always exceptions.

Director Kiyoshi Kurosawa is known for obscure movies and Pulse is more cryptic than most.  He simply doesn’t care about making sense or filling in the blanks.  This ends up being both refreshing and frustrating.  I like having some events left open to interpretation, but we’re approaching the level of making up our own movie.  Why are the ghosts appearing?  (One character does have a theory, that he pulls out of nowhere, but it’s never followed up.)  Why does everyone mark ghost portals with red tape?  Why are the dead on the internet?  Why does no one discuss the decreasing population until the streets are nearly empty?  What happens when a person meets a ghost?  Why do main characters wander off?  Why do those same characters take most of the actions they do?  We are not being left to puzzle out the answers on our own because there are no answers.

Kurosawa is working purely on the level of theme, and as long as the theme is clear, the rest can be indecipherable.   Pulse isn’t about ghosts or frights.  It’s about isolation.  We are alone now and we will be alone forever.  Death makes no difference.  There is only loneliness.  Sound cheerful?  It’s not, though it is artfully told.  There are a few swings at modern life, particularly our gadgets that are supposed to be bringing us together, but are really separating us even more, but that’s just part of the bigger notion that one person never truly connects to another.

So, can a two hour philosophical essay on alienation be a good time?  Surprisingly yes, with a few caveats.  The weakness isn’t in the message (though he does hammer it home).  With so little sense behind characters’ behaviors, the movie drags at the beginning of the third act.  Plus the entire film is distancing.  Yes, it’s about loneliness, but it would have been more effective to let us feel that loneliness instead of keeping us purely as voyeurs.  Rarely does the camera move in.  The movie has been constructed from mid and long shots.  The music editing is also problematic.  Songs start and stop suddenly, as if a tape broke.

Pulse is a good film straining to be a great one.  The ending is powerful and there are moments you won’t be able to forget, but it needed another editing pass.  In a world of alternate DVD versions, there’s still hope.  However, the real problem is the many incomprehensible strands left waving in the wind.

An American remake starring Kristen Bell came out in 2006.

Oct 112001
 
three reels

When Cyrus Kriticos (F. Murray Abraham) dies, he leaves his house to his nephew Arthur (Tony Shalhoub) and his two children (Shannon Elizabeth, Alec Roberts). What they don’t know, is that the house is a machine that holds twelve ghosts. Once people start to die, it is left to Arthur, an ex-associate of Cyrus’ (Matthew Lillard), and a ghost advocate to find the purpose of the thirteenth ghost.

Quick Review: There are many things that can make a film worth your time. A well thought out plot is one.  Consummate acting is another. But when you don’t have those, sometimes an onslaught of sound and music, a torrent of rich colors and complex images, and some amazing effects are enough.  Thir13een Ghosts is a heart-pounding event. The machine-house with its moving panels of inscribed glass is like nothing put on film before. The ghosts are  gruesome, astonishing, repulsive, sexy nightmares that appear and disappear with insane randomness. And if you are looking for bloody deaths, they are in abundance.  Thir13een Ghosts never lets up, never gives you a moment to think.  That works out well, as thinking is a problem.  Dwell too much on the plot and it will fall apart. The characters rarely make sense and include a bizarre throwback to 1930s Hollywood (how exactly can a bankrupt white man afford a black maid?).  But these characters are there to run, scream, bleed and die, and the plot exists to thrust them into danger; with those goals, everything works fine. This is definitely a movie to rent, as buying leads to repeat viewing, and Thir13een Ghosts won’t stand up to such scrutiny. However, watching it once, late at night with all the lights out, is an experience.

Oct 112001
 
two reels

Renegade General Pembroke (Steven Grives) calls dishonorably discharged officer Lt. Peter Doyle (Jeremy Callaghan) back to active duty, claiming he is the only man capable of leading a team to a secret government installation in order to disarm a nuclear bomb.  Joining Doyle is Pembroke-loyalist and nuclear specialist, Lt. Joyce Darwin (Marjean Holden).  Once underway, the team members are picked off one by one by a mysterious alien.

For the first two-thirds, Code Red: The Rubicon Conspiracy is a Predator clone.  There’s a small but tough military team, which includes a mystic and a guy with a big gun so the undergrowth-mowing scene can be reproduced.  The team has two missions, to deal with rebels (this time they have to shut down an autodestruct nuke that the rebels have activated) and to find out what happened to the previous team.  When they find the bodies of those earlier soldiers, something odd has been done to them.  Then they find themselves hunted by a guy who is wearing about half of the Predator’s armor.  Pretty familiar stuff, though that doesn’t mean it couldn’t work again.  It doesn’t hurt that they change things toward the end, with a bit more borrowing from a different extraterrestrial film.

All the alien material is surprisingly good, with the critters looking passable.  And the action is above average for a low-budget production.  The problems come with the characters.  The red-shirts of the team all do their job, but the two main characters are irritating to listen to.  They bicker in every clichéd way that the writer could swipe from other poor movies.  He stole his plot from a good movie; couldn’t he steal his main characters from something at least watchable?  Every moment they are onscreen is unpleasant.  Films, even action films, are about characters, and when you can’t do those right, the rest falls apart.

We’re also stuck with an evil general out to acquire advanced weaponry for his personal gain.  I believe we need a moratorium on that particular plot point.

Code Red is a missed opportunity.  It was never going to be great, but it could have been enjoyable, B-movie action. 

 Aliens, Reviews Tagged with:
Oct 102001
 
four reels

A meteorite hits the Arizona desert, carrying simple, one celled aliens that have the ability to evolve billions of time faster than life on Earth. Community college teacher, Harry Block (Orlando Jones), and his biology teacher/ex-government scientist friend, Ira Kane (David Duchovny), investigate, and figure this is their ticket to bigger things.  However, General Russell Woodman (Ted Levine) and CDC investigator Allison Reed (Julianne Moore) step in and exclude them, until the aliens develop into organisms that could wipe out all life on Earth. It’s up to Ira, Harry, Allison, and reject fireman Wayne Grey (Seann William Scott), to save the day.

Director Ivan Reitman returns to Ghostbusters by way of a 50s alien invasion flick and ends up with Evolution.  Its similarities to that funnier film are obvious and will smack you on the head as you watch. A small group of good natured, but flawed friends find themselves fighting little problems that soon grow into enormous monsters that only can be stopped with an excessive amount of goo splattering on our heroes.  The group, wise-cracking all the way, are stifled by arrogant and unpleasant government agents, who end up making things a whole lot worse. The team members include faculty members of a college who don’t do their jobs, a brainy scientist, an idiot, a porn-lover, a smart-ass, a member who joins the group halfway through the film, and an attractive girl/love interest who doesn’t accept the good guys’ ideas at first, but is won over. Now just collect those characters, merge them together and split them into five people for Ghostbusters and four for Evolution.

Yup, Reitman ripped off himself, but if you are going to steal from a film, you could do a lot worse than Ghostbusters. Sure Evolution is weaker than Ghostbusters in every way, but that still leaves a lot of room to be entertaining. And entertaining it is. What’s amazing is how fresh the jokes are. Duchovny and Jones strike the right notes as if they’re an old comic standup team, and are the heart of the film. Moore and Scott toss in a few good lines as well as supplying the film’s slapstick (although that’s secondary). The dialog is rapid fire, which makes sense considering the entire movie is in overdrive.  Since we’ve seen this story before, Reitman doesn’t bother pretending we need time to work it out. It’s full speed ahead.  For the big government vs. scientists confrontation, he sets it up so you know it’s there, and then bam!, were off on attacking monsters and humor. If you don’t like a joke here or Moore falling down there, there’s another comedy bit already going. It clocks in at 101 minutes, and I bet they started with a 2 hour script, and chopped.

The creature effects work on an “alien monster” level and on a “cute, silly-looking beast” level. With insanely rapid “evolution,” Phil Tippett had an opportunity to make creatures to please every taste.

Watch Ghostbusters. If you say to yourself afterward, “I’d like more of that,” skip  Ghost Busters II and take a look at Evolution.

 Aliens, Reviews Tagged with:
Oct 092001
 
two reels

In the distant future, D, a half-vampire with a demonic hand, is hired to retrieve a girl taken by a powerful vampire.  A group of bounty hunters is also on the trail and D will have to defeat them as well as various monsters if he is to succeed.

Quick Review: A sequel (that’s overly close to being a remake) to 1985’s Vampire Hunter D, Vampire Hunter D: Bloodlust’s animation is a vast improvement on the original’s.  There are still far too many scenes where nothing moves except a character’s eye or mouth and backgrounds are often static.  But for anime, it looks good.  The drawings are lush and show some real artistry.

The story is a mix of Clint Eastwood westerns, Blade, and Dracula.  The vampire wants the girl to be with him forever, but Blade (I mean D) is going to stop that, as is the crude and vicious bounty hunter gang.  The problem with the film is that these characters range between vile and bratty.  Only the vampire lord Meier and his Antebellum-like love interest are in any way sympathetic, but the film hardly spends time with them.  Instead we are treated to scene after scene of deeply unpleasant people fighting monsters.  Why should I care if they get hurt?  Action films need to make me care about the people struggling or it’s just all meaningless motion, but these are not people to care about.  In fact, I’d much prefer they all die so the nice vampire can get away.

Oct 092001
 
toxic

The vampires have decided to join human society and become just another racial group.  However, murder disrupts the political system and a mix matched pair of police, one vampire (Adrian Paul), one human (Bokeem Woodbine), must solve the crimes.

An astonishingly bad film.  Now why do the vampires want to join this future society that’s two parts Nazi Germany, one part techno goth club?  Perhaps because the filmmakers were trying so desperately to say something deep about the Jews in WWII, but couldn’t remember what.  The plot is absurd, reminiscent of a live-action Vampire the Masquerade role-playing session.  Vampires in politics, what fun!  The action scenes are what you get when incompetents try to copy The Matrix.  If you don’t have the money and skill to use wire-work, don’t use wire-work.  Is that so tricky?

But it is the characters and appalling acting that transforms this film to toxic waste.  The buildings act better than Bokeem Woodbine as  the clichéd, hard-talking, always grouchy human cop.  He must be tough because he says “fuck.”  As he’s really tough, he must say it several hundred times.  Apparently the writer couldn’t come up with dialog for him, so he just kept pasting in “fuck.”  It’s a fine word, but perhaps, just perhaps, a second or even a third word would be nice.  Adrian Paul, avoiding his Highlander persona, decides that somewhere between John Waters and the Men in Black is the perfect fit.  It isn’t.

The setting is somewhere near the present (they have plastic), but in a 1984-like police state, with slogans suggesting that citizens turn in their neighbors.  The cars look about forty years out-of-date and the buildings are falling down.  Shot is bold, primary colors, I found I was really taken in by this world.  Too bad something wasn’t done with it.  The Breed demonstrates that films are about characters, not about the environment, so when your characters are unappealing, and, far worse, uninteresting, nothing else matters.

 Reviews, Vampires Tagged with:
Oct 092001
 
two reels

A five-man hazardous waste crew take on a rush job of cleaning the asbestos from an abandoned insane asylum. The team consists of Gordon (Peter Mullan), who can’t deal with the stress of his new baby, Hank (Josh Lucas), a greedy conman, Phil (David Caruso), who holds a grudge against Hank, Mike (Stephen Gevedon), who studied psychology but gave up on it, and Jeff (Brendan Sexton), an inexperienced kid who fears the dark. As the others fall apart, Mike listens to tapes of a long dead patient with multiple personalities.

Session 9 is a low budget horror flick, shot on video without expensive cameras. Director Brad Anderson tries to turn the natural lighting, shaking shots, and 2-D look into style and partly succeeds, but after a while, it becomes tiring to watch. The lighting is the worst, but some allowances must be made for the budget.

It is a dense film, somewhat too slow, but packed with little clues to what is actually going on. Everything on screen could have a meaning, and most of it is left open. I have heard three interpretations of the plot (that it’s a simple case of a mental breakdown, that it’s about a demonic possession, or that it’s about one man and his imaginary friends), and in each case, the person was absolutely sure he was right. I’d like to say that the multiple ways of seeing the story are due to the brilliance of the screenplay, but it’s not the case. The story is confused and no interpretation completely works (each leaves at least one contradiction); with a tale this complex and with the last minute removal of a subplot, I’d expect holes. However you take it, this is a cipher film, with all the meaning of your average jigsaw. It’s interesting to see how each piece fits together (that the fallen grave marker pertains to the interrogation room, etc.), but that’s all the theme there is.

 Reviews, Slashers Tagged with:
Oct 092001
 
two reels

Mask-wearing, immortal Jason Voorhees is cryogenically frozen in the near future, along with beautiful Rowan (Lexa Doig).  When both are thawed on a spaceship 400 years later, it is up to Rowan to stop Jason from killing everyone on board.

Quick Review: This is what you do when you realize your franchise is way past the point of salvation.  “Jason in Space” is every bit as dumb as it sounds.  The plot is minute, the characters are cardboard, and the scares are missing, but that’s nothing new for the Friday the 13th series. Unlike its many predecessors, this 10th outing is fun in a mindless, camp fashion.  The setting makes it obvious the writer watched Alien a few times; if you are going to steal, steal from the best.  Doig is attractive and can act as least as well as anyone in a Friday the 13th movie.  She plays a robot on her TV show Andromeda while Lisa Ryder plays a human there but a robot in Jason X.  Hmmmm.  It’s clear no one was taking this project seriously, which is a welcome change from earlier films in the series.

 Reviews, Slashers Tagged with:
Oct 092001
 
four reels

Lois is set for a perfect Christmas with visits to friends, a huge meal, presents purchased early, and baby Stewie in the Christmas play.  Stewie, on the other hand, is worried about this megalomaniacal Santa Claus who is always watching him.  When Peter accidentally gives all the presents away to charity, it is the first in a series of calamities which will ensure a less-than-merry Christmas.

I couldn’t guess which animated series has offended more people, Family Guy or South Park, but there is no question that Family Guy wins in pure weirdness.  It discards normal narrative structures, tossing in random jokes and social comments, and alters the universe at will.  And it works.

A Very Special Family Guy Freakin’ Christmas has plenty of slapstick, with chases, a burning tree, attacks by small pet store fish, slipping on foam, and Brian the dog having a TV fall on him.  But that’s just filler.  What really stands out is the great dialog.

“As we all know, Christmas is that mystical time of year when the ghost of Jesus rises from the grave to feast on the flesh of the living! So we all sing Christmas Carols to lull him back to sleep.”

If you find that funny, then there’s at lot for you to love in the show.  If not…well, follow the lead of the guy in the episode who objected to it as blasphemy, but realized there was nothing he could do.  He sighed and said, “Well I guess I’ll just have to develop a sense of humor.”

Watch this annually with Woodland Critter Christmas for your twisted Christmas needs.

Oct 082001
 
two reels

Yuri (Chiharu Nîyama), a faux reporter for a fake documentary TV series, stumbles upon information about three guardian monsters, Baragon, Mothra, and Ghidorah, who will rise up to defend Japan when Godzilla returns.  Obsessed with reporting real news, she sets out to film the monster combat.  Her father is an admiral who lived through Godzilla’s 1954 attack, and is in charge of making plans for defeating him, with insufficient aid from the government.  When Godzilla does rise out of the sea, there is little the military can do, because he is a mystical creature, filled with the angry souls of those who died in Asia during WWII.

Forget everything you know about Godzilla.  The filmmakers have.  Forget all previous Godzilla films except the 1954 original, and even that one has the “wrong.” perspective.  Forget that Godzilla is a physical creature created or transformed by nuclear testing, and that he represents the horror of the atomic bombs dropped on Nagasaki and Hiroshima.  Certainly forget his friend-to-children phase.  Forget that Mothra is the god of a primitive tribe of Pacific Islanders and that Ghidorah is an evil space monster.  All that forgetting may be difficult for long time fans, but intransigence is hardly a good starting point for judging any movie.

Shusuke Kaneko had reinvented the Gamera series, transforming it from an embarrassment to a respectable part of the genre.  Godzilla, Mothra and King Ghidorah: Giant Monsters All-Out Attack (thankfully shortened to GMK by people who hate excessively long titles) was his shot at revitalizing the Godzilla franchise, and, he certainly did shoot something.

OK, a side issue: what’s with the name?  Japanese films used to be mutilated for U.S. release and given titles that had no relation to the original.  But now the distributors are over compensating.  We get stuck with literal translations that are ridiculous.  Perhaps Godzilla, Mothra and King Ghidorah: Giant Monsters All-Out Attack sounds really cool in Japanese, but in English is comes off as a model of indecisiveness.

Kaneko didn’t make an atomic monster movie at all.  He made a ghost story, with some loose Shinto mysticism tossed in.  Godzilla is a ghost (possessed by the souls of the dead…same thing), a nearly mindless spirit of destruction, taking revenge for the pain caused long ago, or more accurately, for how modern Japanese have forgotten that pain and refuse to take responsibility for it.  Yeah!  Now that’s a metaphor I can get behind.  It’s pretty heavy stuff, and just what fantasy is so good at.  It tangles with questions of respect, which are important to the Japanese, as well as those of morality, that are universal.  The guardians are a nice touch as well, and they are ripe for symbolic representation.  It’s an interesting concept; the most interesting the series had seen in 47 years.  It should have produced the best film since 1954.  It didn’t.

Kaneko set up a very serious film, as dark if not darker than the original.  Thus, like the original, we need to see believable pain and suffering, and empathize with it.  There needs to be a focus on humans who can sweep us into the tragedy, and jokes and camp elements need to be kept distant.  GMK is headed in that direction, but it all falls apart once Baragon (who first popped up in Frankenstein Conquers the World, but doesn’t manage to make the title of this flick) sticks his glowing horned head into the picture.  He’s obviously a guy on his hands and knees, covered in devil-red foam, and waggling two puppy-dog ears.  This is not an image for a solemn film about possible war crimes.  Even dim lighting wouldn’t have helped much, and he’s shot bright as day.

With the steadily improving Godzilla suits from film to film, I hoped he’d be able to keep things on the proper somber note, but the costume is a step backwards.  His new look, with the white, pupil-less eyes, gives him an evil continence, but the body, with its rolls of rubber fat, is the least realistic since the early ’80s.  It is far too clearly a guy in a suit.  Every step isn’t the step of a malevolent bipedal lizard, but a 37-year-old guy wearing oversized shoes.  Adding to that problem is the relatively poor optical effects.  The Big-G’s atomic breath is animated in a much simpler style than it had been in the last eight movies (even curving upward at one point as it had in the ’70s); a very strange development considering the impressive look of Gamera’s fire balls in all three of Kaneko’s Gamera films.

Mothra and Ghidorah are little better.  These two had been forced on Kaneko, who had wanted less known monsters as his guardians (completely new monsters would have been cleverer), but then he’d chosen Baragon the Puppy Muppet, so it’s hard to stand by a claim that the studio screwed up the project.  Ghidorah is the only good choice since he is an oriental dragon—traditional protectors in the East.  Sure beats a big Moth.  That Moth isn’t too bad when computer generated, but the CGI work doesn’t blend well with the puppetry.  Ghidorah has never looked worse.  He was slicker in 1964’s Ghidrah, the Three-Headed Monster.  He’s passable when CGI, but his initial guy-in-suit entrance will only inspire laughs.  It’s clear that the suit is sitting on a little cart which someone is tugging across the set.  Do three-headed dragons have wheels?

The monsters fight endlessly without causing much excitement.  Normally, lots of monster-on-monster action is what these films are for, but this isn’t supposed to be a fun, adventure romp.  It’s a weighty morality play, and the silly rubber suits and slug-outs break the mood.  There are also a string of in-jokes and homages (a comment on the American Godzilla feature, numerous cameos including twin girls looking upward as Mothra flies over, etc.) which would be great in a lighter film.  If the point was to tell jokes and show men in preposterous outfits rolling about to give the audience a frivolous good time, great (that’s the intent of most Godzilla films).  But that wasn’t what Kaneko started to make.  A sincere examination of the horrors of war and the massacre of innocents doesn’t go well with a floppy-eared plush toy.  It’s like watching Shindler’s List and finding Kermit the Frog in a concentration camp while Robin Williams pitches one-liners.

Even if this was another monster-rumble pic, the big fight would be tedious.  The damn critters won’t stay dead.  One dies, comes back to life (in a scene stolen from an earlier Godzilla movie), dies again, and comes back again.  For God’s sake, when something dies, leave it alone.  Then there is the matter of the internal submarine (“internal” as in inside Godzilla’s stomach), and Godzilla shooting a beam through his side.  It’s pretty good comedy, at a moment when the last thing the movie needed was a laugh.

I’ve written a lot about the monsters, but nothing about the humans.  That’s because they don’t matter.  Yuri is the main character and gets the bulk of the screen time (more than the monsters), but she doesn’t do anything.  She follows around the giants and comments on them.  There’s a little romantic three-way going on, but like the old ’50s American giant monster flicks, it doesn’t go anywhere.  I was happy that there wasn’t some convoluted human subplot, but I would have like to see Yuri do something with the main plot.  Maybe wake the guardians, or die and become a restless soul to power them, or get everyone to recognize the sins of the past so all those angry ghosts in Godzilla could rest in peace.  Oh well.

Since there’s always some fun to be had in Godzilla stomping about (a girl in a hospital watching as Godzilla walks by almost makes the whole thing worthwhile), I’m not recommending that you skip GMK.  Just wait till it shows up on cable on a day you happen to be home and bored.   Too bad.  It could have been much more.

Oct 082001
 
one reel

Dr. Oh, a mad scientist (Pat Morita), creates an obedient, ninja “clone” (Masakatsu Funaki) to kill his ex-colleagues, Dr. Markov (Gregory Vahanian), Dr. Forster (Alexandra Kamp-Groeneveld), and Dr. Hiller (Allan Kolman).  The three hire Mitchell Madsen (Sam Bottoms), an assassin with a bad liver, to stop Oh.  Things become more complicated when the ninja clone meets a prostitute (Cassandra Grae) who teaches him to be human.  Additionally, Dr. Hiller, who is also a mad scientist, is creating his own killer clone, Kismet (Bas Rutten).

The question is, do the actors lack the skills of the average grammar school Christmas pageant participant, or is director Makoto Yokoyama easily confused when both dialog and motion happen in a single scene?  Some of both, I suspect, but most of the blame has to go to Yokoyama, since it would be too difficult to find this many talentless performers.  Yokoyama’s experience comes from helming Power Rangers adventures, and he uses all the skills developed there on this film.  So, he gives us unbelievable characters, overacting, inappropriate pauses, and a range of other flaws.  At times, Yokoyama thinks he’s making an old school, Japanese martial arts epic, with the great warrior ripping off his shirt, flexing, screaming, and then walking into a fatal hail of bullets, never falling until he has reached his opponent.  This style is horribly mismatched when applied to the very Western, grumpy hitman mumbling about how rough it was in Nam (or whatever unknown military conflict he was a part of in his uninteresting and underdeveloped past).

The script, assuming there was one, doesn’t help.  Every third word from Madsen is “goddamned.”  “He’s a goddamned monster.”  “He’s a goddamned killing machine.”  “All I want is his goddamned liver.”  “I just want your goddamned help.”  Couldn’t they think of another expletive?  Or perhaps let him speak without an adjective now and again.  But then Sam Bottoms is miscast in the part of a gruff, action hero anyway.  He looks silly aiming a pistol.

Masakatsu Funaki can’t act, but he can move.  As long as the focus is on Funaki kicking things, or either of the mad scientists doing megalomania routines, the film is fun.  Unfortunately, it frequently veers off into painful “character development” that no one should have to suffer through.

Back to Mad Scientists