Oct 012006
 
1.5 reels

Theo (Tom Hardy), the son of the tribal elder (Rutger Hauer), chooses to be one of the sacrifices required every five years of their village.  He and the other “youths” travel to the capitol where King Deucalion (Tony Todd) casts them into the catacombs to be killed by the half-god minotaur.  But Theo has his own plans: to kill the beast.  He is aided by Princess Raphaela (Michelle Van De Water), who hates Deucalion and asked a seer to find a hero to slay the monster.

A teen Fantasy/Horror retelling of Theseus and the Minotaur, the emphasis in Minotaur is on frights and impaling late teens/early twenty-year-olds.  It’s all about finding a way to get a young body on a bull’s horn.

Calling this a version of the Greek myth is being generous.  Don’t expect any clever ways of getting out of the labyrinth.  There’s a giant undead bull who’s called The Minotaur and a guy named Theseus, although he goes by Theo.  Beyond that, there are screaming teens and unexplainable gas vents.  The inspiration is cheap budget horror movies.  There’s little of Greece here.

Fantasy flicks are expensive to make, so when money is scarce, the corner-cutting can be painful.  As endless speeches and pseudo-emotional heart-to-hearts are less expensive than epic battles, walks through flowing cities, or brightly lit creatures, Minotaur is filled with talking.  Our heroes run from the monster, and then find a nice spot to chat for ten minutes.  Another brief chase and they’ve found a hiding place to tell their stories.  Most of the discussions are irrelevant to the plot; they just fill in time.

On the plus side are the old pros taking supporting roles.  Rutger Hauer (Blade Runner, Buffy the Vampire Slayer, Omega Doom) and Tony Todd (Night of the Living Dead, Candy Man,) are far from their best here, but they are always a kick to watch.  Hauer is only around long enough to give some energy to the proceedings, but Todd gets plenty of time to wax philosophical with his lilting tones.  Ex-sex goddess Ingrid Pitt (The Wicker Man) makes a cameo as a leprous soothsayer, which doesn’t use any of her skills, but its nice to know she’s still around.

The not-that-youthful youths are generic, but that’s as much a function of the drab, monochrome cinematography as their acting.  Ten minutes after it is over, I doubt if you’d be able to pick them out on the street.  The exception is the uncommonly beautiful Michelle Van De Water, who is at least distinctive with her performance, and is so attractive that her other skills are irrelevant.

Minotaur was a good idea for a film, but money and talent were in too short supply for the final product to be anything but a grim time waster.

Back to Fantasy

 Fantasy, Reviews Tagged with:
Sep 292006
 
3,5 reels

Demon Hunter Yi Gwak (Woo-sung Jung) saves a village from demons and is betrayed for his troubles. Drugged, he escapes to fall unconscious in the woods, awakening in Mid-heaven, the land the dead go to before passing on to Heaven and being reincarnated. But Yi Gwak isn’t dead, a fact that is some consternation to everyone. Previously, his wife, Yon-hwa (Tee-hee Kim) had been murdered by superstitious villagers for being a witch. Yi Gwak had gone on to join the empire’s elite demon hunting squad, lead by Ban-chu (Jun-ho Heo), who understood his pain having lost his own wife. All of the team except Yi Gwak then died when Ban-chu lead them against the corrupt nobles. The afterlife is supposed to be free of such strife, but instead the protectors of the realm are being wiped out by demons, lead by Ban-chu and supported by the old hunter gang. Yi Gwak is stuck opposing then when he finds his wife, the last surviving protector, but she is now an archangel renamed So-hwa who has had her memory erased. Her goal is to save Mid-heaven; Yi Gwak’s is to save her.

The Restless, a Korean sword-fantasy-romance also known as Demon Empire, is harsh for someone in mourning, like me. In part that is because it spoke to me. Yes, this is a film filled with flashing swords and magic, but action isn’t the point. Grief and the meaning of life is the focus and The Restless knows what it is doing with those.

Sure, if what you want is wire-fu, you’ll be happy. There’s a lot of leaping and slashing. Magic swords are the norm and the demons and their ilk fight with chains and an infinite supply of short throwing spears. It looks good, particularly the deaths as bodies dissolve like burning paper. The scenery is better. Apparently almost everything is computer generated and it is beautiful.

But there are plenty of Asian costume-fantasies with fancy fight choreography. The Restless stands out on theme. The world presented is shades of gray. Stereotypically good people are hard to find. Villagers are murderers. The government is filled with raping creeps and everyone is willing to kill those in their way. But there are also few purely bad guys. Those villagers were desperate, just trying to survive. The main villains, the demon hunters, are generally noble and desperately trying to put an end to corruption and suffering. And we really don’t know the situation with the rulers—our information on them is second and third hand. As for the gods and protectors, there’s some question if the entire system of the heavens isn’t a mess based on foolish philosophy. Is rebirth really a goal if it strips you of what you are? If you want to do the right thing in life, The Restless says give up on that—there is no right thing, and even if there were, you’d fail. The only thing worth clinging to is love, even if it makes you miserable. That’s a philosophy I can work with.

All that theme comes off best when it is originating from or directed at So-hwa. She is the definition of adorable, with anime features and doe eyes. She is also perpetually perplexed, which, of course, is the point. Without memories, she only has the unbending rules of Mid-heaven to guide her. But she’s just a student protector in way over her head, and while the enemy seems clear to her, the logic of those unbending rules is not.

Not everything comes off so well. Woo-sung Jung overplays the tortured swordsman and I really want to give him a comb to tame is 2000’s rock-star hair. Other reviews have praised the martial arts, but it was my least favorite element of the film. It’s too elongated. But that’s true of every aspect of the picture. Be it swinging a sword or gazing into another’s eyes, every shot is held a beat too long. If feels like a spaghetti western. I want to go in a pull every 10th frame. Still, beauty and theme win out over excessive pausing, making The Restless one of the best martial arts films of this century.

Sep 282006
 
2.5 reels

A plane, carrying two unstable, intelligent, killing robots, crashes on a Pacific island.  A military team is sent in to retrieve the robots before they learn too much and become unstoppable.  To complicate matters, a gang of criminals, escaping their latest caper in a helicopter, lands on the same island.

Some movies have important themes that help you to understand your existence. Some have intricate characters with which you can empathize.  Some have complicated plots that will stretch your mind. A.I. Assault has cool CGI robots.

This is grade-A, family, schlock cinema.  Now, keep in mind that anything called “schlock” can only be so good, and when it’s family friendly, that knocks it down further.  But for an hour and a half, if you can be contented with a pair of giant robots clanking around and cutting up people with their tentacles, and nothing more, you’ll be happy.

The job of everything that isn’t a robot is to not lower the level of the production.  So, the acting is good enough not to be noticed and the characters are generically acceptable.  The cinematography is adequate.  Only the simplistic dialog calls attention to itself, and that is only at times.  Mostly, everyone speaks in clichĂ©s. The scientist even says, when referring to a plan, “It’s crazy enough to work,” but I took that as a deliberate joke.

A.I. Assault may be the new king of cameos.  Or perhaps I should phrase that, “the new master of misleading advertising.” It is being sold based on genre actors who are barely on screen.  The online poster and TV commercials name Robert Picardo, Alexandra Paul, and Michael Dorn.  None of them are major characters. Seven well-known actors (in the sci-fi community) have bit parts.  Most never share a frame with the leads, and rarely with anyone else.  They obviously showed up when they had a few hours, recited their lines on a quickly made backdrop, and then took off.  They are:

George Takei (Star Trek: original series) – cameo.
Michael Dorn (Star Trek: The Next Generation) – periphery.
Robert Picardo (Star Trek: Voyager) – cameo.
Alexandra Paul (Baywatch) – cameo.
Hudson Leick (Xena) – secondary.
Bill Mumy (Lost in Space) – periphery.
Tim Thomerson (Trancers) – periphery.

If you are watching for one of these actors, only fans of Xena‘s Callisto will be mildly satisfied.

So, you’ve got CGI robots.  That’s it.  Look for more and you’ll be disappointed.  But who doesn’t like a big spidery robot?

 Reviews, Robots Tagged with:
Aug 242006
 
one reel

Alfred Borden (Christian Bale) is an unpleasant and unlikable aid to an older magician. Robert Angier (Hugh Jackman), who may or may not be unpleasant and unlikable, but becomes so after his wife dies, is a second aid. When the aforementioned wife drowns during a trick, most likely due to Borden’s tying a knot too tightly, the two enter into an insufferable competition, to be the best magician and to hurt the other. Borden acquires a wife and child. Angier picks up the old magician’s trick designer, Cutter (Michael Caine) and an assistant, Olivia (Scarlett Johansson). After a series of unpleasant events, Angier comes to believe that Tesla (David Bowie) built Borden’s greatest trick so goes off to get his own copy. And if things weren’t bleak enough before, they are from that point on.

(Spoilers for the second act)
The Prestige is a cheat in a cheat wrapped in a cheat. Some of those cheats are clever. Some aren’t. But they are all cheats that rip the foundation of the film apart. One of those cheats is why I’m reviewing the film. I don’t generally review period dramas, so there’s obviously something else going on. And that something else is real magic dressed up as science fiction. Angier believes that Tesla can build a devise that will allow the appearance of teleportation, but that turns out to be one of the many twists as he was fooled into that assumption. But wouldn’t you know it, Tesla actually can create an actual teleportation machine. So a movie that demands that all is real, and insists that you watch very closely to see how everything is truly being done just sticks in a teleporter that has a very specific glitch (but that’s an additional spoiler…).

Christopher Nolan, who played a clever trick on his audience with Memento just goes nuts with The Prestige. It’s not surprising that a film about stage magicians has a few twists but I must say The Prestige really outdoes any other film I can think of. And a majority of those twists are also cheats. He is so intent on showing you how clever he is—which the teleporter destroys—that he never bothers to think about if it makes any sense or would work. The teleporter is the only entry into science fiction or real magic, but it isn’t the hardest thing to believe. That would be a twist that involves Victorian-era makeup being far superior to anything we know now. OK, I take back my science fiction comment. The only way the makeup trick would work is if we are in the distant future of Mission Impossible mask making. Plus… No, too many spoilers. Just assume that if it is a twist, it probably is a cheat, and it probably won’t hold up to any kind of inspection. And yes, most films have a hole or two, but most films don’t demand that you study them looking for the oh-so-clever bread crumbs laid out for you.

And all of that makes the film sound both worse and better than it is. As I said, some of those twists and cheats are fun. It is a bizarrely literal film—that’s part of Nolan playing clever. Outside of the teleporter, every other twist is literally told to you. But, Nolan rightly thinks you won’t believe what you are told. And, that’s smart, or would be in a different film. Some of the ideas are good as long as there’s no world around them or time to dwell. The thing about an idea is that an idea does not make a feature film. An idea is the heart of a short story, not a novel, and so, is the basis for short film. You want a feature, you think about character. Nolan has ideas for two or three great ten minute shorts.

All the plot cheats wouldn’t damn the film if the characters could carry it. But they can’t. Borden (or Bale, I really can’t tell the difference) is distasteful to watch. There’s no character depth or anything interesting about him—by design as all is illusion—so we’re left with a lousy person doing repulsive things. As for Angier, I spent over two hours just wanting to slap him. And both of these characters should have been sympathetic—perhaps not likeable, but sympathetic. For God’s sake, Angier’s wife died. I am the easiest audience in existence for a man in mourning and I wanted to push him down a flight of stairs. If Nolan couldn’t manage sympathetic, then he absolutely had to make them compelling, but they aren’t. There’s no stakes in their feud, not for the audience. Who cares who wins? Who cares who get the greatest trick or who destroys whom? We are given no reason to care.

I can put up with a lot of inconsistency and foolishness in a film if you give me some characters I want to follow. And those ideas, even the ones that fail, make me want to like The Prestige, but it is a bad time at the theater.

The film makes a big deal out of the rules for any magic trick. It must have three parts: 1) The Presentation where all looks normal; 2) The Turn where the impossible happens; 3) The Prestige where all is returned to normalcy. This is meant to apply not only to the tricks, but to this film. But The Prestige has no prestige. It shows the world, mucks things up, and then ends. For a time I was sure that we had an unreliable narrator as that’s the only way this could work, but that’s pulled out from under our feet. Nope. What we see is what we get, and what we get is senseless and a chore to sit through.

 Reviews, Science Fiction Tagged with:
Feb 252006
 
two reels

Superman returns to Earth (thus the title) after a five year absence. While he was away, Lois has had a child and Lex Luthor has gotten out of prison. Luthor’s plan is once again based on real-estate and will kill millions. Superman must stop Luthor as he attempts to reintegrate with society.

So, Superman has been gone for five years on a trip to Krypton, yet the story ignores that. He could have been in Wisconsin writing his novel for all it matters to the film. Instead, the plot is about Lex Luthor wanting to sell real-estate (because that was in Superman I) and the Superman/Lois/some dude love triangle that no one was crying out for.

Superman Returns never had a chance. Director Bryan Singer, who’d had success with the X-Men, didn’t make a film that could stand on it’s own; he made an homage to the old Christopher Reeve movies. This is a big budget fan film. We get scene after scene that either references the earlier films or are directly stolen from them.

Ignoring Superman III and IV, and making a sequel to Superman II was a fine idea. Giving Brandon Routh no chance to make the title character his own was not so good. Routh is good as Routh, but he makes a second rate Reeve. Kate Bosworth is a bland Lois, the beginning of an unfortunate trend in underwritten and poorly performed female love-interests in superhero films (see Nolan’s Batman).

And did they retcon away the out-of-nowhere memory stealing kiss from Superman II? If not, shouldn’t Lois be a bit freaked about having a son by a “man” that she has no recollection of having sex with? Shouldn’t see be thinking about super-roofies?

While it feels too much like Donner’s work in most way, the tone is off. Brandon’s Superman has the goofy Kent bit down, and Spacey’s Lex (and his many sidekicks) are pure comedy, but it’s presented as serious. We get a dark and nasty presentation of pure camp, and the first step toward the dismay and Jesus fixation that would mark Snyder’s take on the character.

 Reviews, Superhero Tagged with:
Dec 232005
 
two reels

The biggest mistake of Revenge of the Sith is making it so self-serious. It wants to be a Shakespeare tragedy, which is odd for a series based on afternoon serials. The second biggest was Hayden Christensen. Granted, the actor never had a chance, But Ewan McGregor managed to elevate his poor dialog while Christensen drags it down from horrendous into a deep, dark pit. He is so relentlessly bad that it is almost some kind of weird victory. How could he have managed this level of ineptitude? No moment with Christensen/Anakin is good, and you can’t escape him. Of all the prequel films, this is the one truly about Anakin, which makes it even worse as his arc is constructed so poorly. Nothing about his character is human. People do not act this way, and his sudden (and it is ridiculously sudden) switch to being a villain comes off as funny. But that’s not the only unintentionally humorous moment. Killing children shouldn’t be a laugh-riot, but there’s no other way to take it.

Does this film have anything? Well, again, it looks good. The music is good. And all the lightsaber battles are nicely choreographed—even if the one that is supposed to be dramatic has that stupid “I’ve got the higher ground” moment.

Dec 042005
 
two reels

When their father (Tim Robbins) has to work on a Saturday, peevish brothers Walter (Josh Hutcherson) and Danny (Jonah Bobo) play an old board game that Danny finds in the basement.  The game, Zathura, transfers their house to deep space, and each move tosses a new danger at them, including a malfunctioning robot and alien lizards.  To get home, they must finish the game.

Based on Chris Van Allsburg’s sequel to his award-winning picture book, Jumanji, Zathura does not claim to be a follow-up to the 1995 Robin Williams-Kirsten Dunst film of the earlier story.  That is the first of many mistakes.  Giving up the mantel of sequel, Zathura appears as a low budget remake.  Again we have a ’50s-style board game that create genre-style dangers on each turn.  Again there are the two siblings, the release of a previous player stuck in the game for years, and the destruction of the family house.  None of that’s bad, but it is awfully familiar.

Zathura is a claustrophobic, almost stage-bound picture, rarely departing from scenes of conversations within a few rooms of an old house, but when it does is when the movie sings.  Although the film is being sold on its emphasis on humanity over special effects, it is the effects that work.  A shot of a ringed planet, a clunky robot that flies through the wall of the house to return through another wall, a meteor shower, and an assortment of alien ships, are joyful, old-time space opera material created with modern technology.  This is Buck Rogers the way they couldn’t make it years ago.

But when not overwhelming with slick visuals (and booming sound), this is a remarkably drab affair.  Walter and Danny are annoying kids who might engender a parents’ love, but no one else’s, and it’s hard to imagine anyone being interested in their sibling rivalry.  With so much time spent on smashing you over the head with its message of “be nice to your brother,” it’s clear that Zathura is intended for young boys, but the filmmakers are out of touch with what young boys like.  No ten-year-old wants to watch two kids bicker about family issues while being interrupted on rare occasions by a killer robot.  He wants to watch the killer robot.  Cut ninety percent of the redundant squabbling, and all of Tim Robbins’ so-slow fatherly emotion jags, and put in more jokes and attacking monsters, and you’d have a nice family film.

At the pre-screening I attended, about half the audience was made up of families, and just like the lone adults, the children of those families were silent.  The only reactions came from parents, who were excited that a film was telling their kids to behave.  Of course the kids were just waiting for the next alien attack.

Oct 112005
 
four reels

Hoping to help her destitute family and dying brother, young, innocent, Filipino Rosa (Alessandra De Rossi) has taken a job as a maid in Singapore with the Teo family. They are kind, though Mr. Teo is distant and Mrs. Teo is domineering. Their twenty-year-old son, Ah Soon (Benny Soh) is mentally retarded and likes Rosa a bit too much. It is the seventh month, a time when the locals believe ghosts walk the streets and special precautions must be taken.  Rosa doesn’t know the rules, and apparently offends the spirits. Soon, she is seeing ghosts everywhere. What do the ghosts want, and is their any connection to a previous maid who disappeared?

Advertised as Singapore’s first horror film (and I have no reason to doubt it), The Maid shames the old pros and shows that new blood is always desirable. It’s also the most accessible Asian horror film anyone from the Americas or Europe is likely to stumble upon since it doesn’t require any pre-knowledge of the society to get all the nuances. Rosa isn’t any more familiar with Singapore than the average Westerner. The temples, rituals, and dangers are all new to her, and if anything doesn’t fit in with normal behavior, neither she, nor the viewer, recognize that until it is too late. We enter the story with her, and learn as she does.

The Maid has been advertised, and described by critics, as an Eastern take on The Sixth Sense, and that’s at least partly true.  Rosa does see dead people, but it isn’t considered weird to do so. When she tells this to the Teos, they don’t doubt her or suggest that she’s psychotic. Instead, they tell her that’s she’s done something to upset the ghosts. Everyone either sees ghosts or accepts their existence. The sidewalks are filled nightly with families burning sacrifices to their ancestors. Seats are left vacant in the front row of the theater for the ghosts, and everyone knows not to turn back if your name is called at night. This is The Sixth Sense if Cole has said, “I see dead people” and Malcolm had replied, “Yeah, who doesn’t. I’m pretty sure my deceased folks are at the show tonight.  Now, let’s discover your real problem.”

There are plenty of minor scares and a great deal of tension, all related to isolation. Rosa is alone and helpless in a country she doesn’t understand, with what are to her, bizarre customs.  She has no one she can talk to and very few options. The fear isn’t of things that go bump in the night, particularly after we learn that there are things bumping around everywhere and they do little harm, but of being powerless.

Heightening Rosa’s solitude, while making the film easier for English speakers, is language. Her native tongue is Filipino (or Tagalog) while everyone around her speaks a dialect of Chinese. To communicate, they must use a language that no one is at home with: English. About half of the movie is in English; the rest is subtitled.

Western critics, mainly American, have unfairly maligned The Maid, first for being too much like Ju-on, and then for not being enough like it. Connecting the two films is absurd. You might as well compare The Maid to The Seven Samurai, since both have many Asian people and not everyone lives. Before claiming The Maid is derivative of Ju-on, you need to throw up your hands and declare that the Orient is a strange place you don’t understand and all films from there look the same. As for it not being enough like Japan’s champion fright fest, the complaint is that The Maid isn’t as scary. No kidding. The terror in Ju-on comes from an unreasoning, unstoppable force that devours anyone who is unlucky enough to be in the wrong place at the wrong time. The much lesser frights here involve being alone and not understanding what is happening.

The Maid is one of the best #-horror films of the last seven years.  The acting is flawless, the cinematography bounces between acceptable and beautiful, and the culture is fascinating. The story is one of the strongest in recent ghost movies, and while it isn’t too taxing to figure out the ending, chances are you’ll be too involved with the characters to try. Things do drag in the middle, with a scene too many of sweeping, but the ghosts rev things back up.

The Tartan DVD (which has an irrelevant long-haired ghost picture on the cover) has issues with the aspect ratio.  If you have a standard 4×3 TV, you’ll need to change the settings on your player to widescreen or the picture will appear stretched.

Oct 112005
 
one reel

Thirty years before the events of Ringu, and eleven after anything of interest to audiences will happen, Sadako (Yukie Nakama), the evil ghost of the first film, is a meek, twenty-something-year-old who has joined an acting troop in Tokyo.  She’s also followed by the visage of her evil self.  People of no importance die, and the hyperactive troop all blame Sadako for no good reason.  Some have seen the ghostly girl, but since she’s half the size of Sadako, and always has her face covered, there’s zero connection, but oh well, nothing else makes sense so why should that?  Sound engineer TĂ´yama, who likes his women quiet, submissive, and nearly lacking in personality and thought, is naturally attracted to Sadako, and since no one else has ever said anything nice to her, she to him.  Thus begins a really drab romance that can’t end well, since we all know that Sadako becomes rather unpleasant in three decades and has to be dead sometime in there.

More than anything else, a sequel should not harm the original.  It should not  contradict its theme, change plot elements that had carried us along, or alter how characters had been in that first film.  It shouldn’t destroy an ending that we struggled with those characters to reach, and it shouldn’t tell us anything that could destroy the mystery that made the first picture haunt our dreams.  Is that too much to ask?  I’m not even asking for the sequel to make sense, tell an interesting story, or have any reason for existing—just not to mess up what’s already good.  As for prequels, that goes double.

Ringu 0: Birthday is a prequel to Ringu, the film that started the J-horror movement and made horror frightening again.  That it didn’t need a prequel I take as a given.  That this prequel adds nothing was no surprise either.  All it accomplishes is to bring Sadako into the light.  Now, one of the things that made Ringu so frightening was the enigmatic nature of the ghost.  Ringu 0 does its best to kill that, while simultaneously answering no questions.  That took talent.  It says nothing about Sadako’s mother’s suicide or how she came to curse a video tape.  What we get is a story only vaguely related to the one in Ringu and a whole new group of magical powers.  Sadako has split in half.  Apparently using the transporter from Star Trek, she’s now made up of a good Sadako and an evil Sadako.  The bad one’s been kept locked in a room with a TV and injected with drugs to keep her small (hmmm, what drugs would those be?), but she can astral project, which she does a lot so she can appear to walk across rooms ominously.

Still, if taken on its own, it isn’t a complete failure.  It’s an improvement over the techno-gibberish-filled Ringu 2, and never made me snicker, which again, is a step in the right direction.  The acting isn’t embarrassing and it’s shot as well as your average mid-budget picture.  It’s never scary, but it doesn’t attempt to be.  It’s hardly a horror movie.  It is mainly a drama about a meek girl with a bad past and mental problems and her experiences with a guy who likes her and a whole bunch of mindless folks who hate her.  That’s no brilliant drama, but it wouldn’t be bad except for one huge mistake: Sadako.  She’s a milquetoast, little bird.  She hasn’t got a flicker of life or self-determination.  She’s attractive, but that’s it.  Perhaps this flies better in Japan since I’ve seen similar characters in Asian films, though mostly in ones made four or five decades ago.  If this was 1950, and you make a lot of statements around the house like, “barefoot or pregnant, that’s how I like my women,” then Sadako is your girl.  I have no problem with a timid female character, but then I need someone else to hold my emotions.  However, everybody else is slime.  The reporter (who’s mad at Sadako because her even more reprehensible fiancĂ©e died eleven years ago while browbeating Sadako’s mother) and the members of the acting troop are several steps down the evolutionary ladder from the torch wielders marching up the road in Frankenstein.  The boyfriend is too slightly written to matter, which leaves Sadako and she makes bunnies look fierce.  Why should I care about her survival if she isn’t willing to do anything to aid it.  She does stand a lot, looking down.  Wow, the excitement.

The story takes place in one of those alternate worlds where no one ever calls the cops.  The climax should never have happened because everyone would be in custody or at the station answering questions.

Although Ringu 0: Birthday is a better movie than Ringu 2, more effort should be put into avoiding it.  Ringu 2 is too silly to detract from the original film, while  Ringu 0 strips away a bit of the magic and leaves nothing in return.

Oct 112005
 
two reels

Hoping to start over after the events of The Ring, Rachel Keller (Naomi Watts) has moved to a small town with her son Aidan (David Dorfman), but the videotape that kills in seven days pops up again, killing a local student. Rachel destroys the copy. Aidan is then possessed by the ghost of Samara and Rachel must find a way to free her son and stop Samara permanently.

So, how do you make a sequel that’s the equal to one of the most frightening and original films of recent times? Well, you don’t. What shocked the first time isn’t going to the second. The concept is known, the strangeness is common, and there is nowhere to take the story.

But they made one anyway. They didn’t make a bad film, but one which pales next to its predecessor.

The Ring‘s director, Gore Verbinski, cleverly turned down this project, so the producers brought in Hideo Nakata, the director of the original Japanese Ringu and Ringu 2, apparently forgetting that the direction of Ringu was nothing special. They did understand that Ringu 2 was a dry, technobabble-filled waste of celluloid, so they came up with a new idea for a sequel, keeping only the concept of possession and a scene in a well. And what was that idea? Postpartum depression. Yup. Sound exciting? It isn’t.

The whole killer videotape idea gets tossed aside in the first ten minutes to be replaced by PPD. We get riveting scenes of doctors and friends quizzing Rachael on her mood and if she is really hurting Aidan. Since we know she isn’t, these scenes drag. They also kill the creepy mood the movie is trying so desperately to attain (so desperately that it includes attacking CGI deer, that are….well…it was an attempt). If PPD was going to be the theme, couldn’t it have been kept as a subtext instead of stamping on the story?

What The Ring Two has going for it are high production values, a really eerie ghost (Samara may not be what she was in the first film, be she’s still one bizarre kid), effective music, and Naomi Watts. It is the last which saves the film. Watts can act, which is more noticeable as her material is weaker. She makes Rachael a believable character who suffers and cares, and she brought me into the film. Too bad there isn’t an Oscar for Best Performance in a Poorly Conceived Movie.

While Watts may make The Ring Two a watchable flick, I still suggest you skip it as it sullies The Ring, which you’ll never be able to view again without this one squatting in the back of your brain.

An eighteen minute longer “Unrated Edition” was released on DVD—in this case, “unrated” only refers to not being submitted to the MPAA as there are no additional scenes of violence, blood, or nudity. What it has is seventeen unnecessary minutes, slowing the film down to a crawl. There’s extra setup that we don’t need, extra explanation of things that are obvious, extra development of side characters, and extra moments of Rachel dealing with the abuse charges. It does have a more unsettling version of Samara entering Aidan, which is one of the better moments of the film, but it doesn’t make up for the poor pacing of this cut.

It follows not only The Ring, but also the short, Rings.

 Ghost Stories, Reviews Tagged with:
Oct 112005
 
three reels

Timid actress Nagisa Sugiura gets a lead role in a horror film that reenacts a mass murder. Years ago, a professor obsessed with reincarnation, killed the staff and guests of a hotel, including his own children. Nagisa has visions related to the horrendous event, and soon can’t tell the difference between the movie-shoot and the real killings. She isn’t alone, as others of roughly the same age also have visions of the past, and many of them disappear. Is Nagisa insane, or is she a reincarnated victim, fated, with the others, to repeat their deaths?

Takashi Shimizu (Ju-On 1 & 2, Tomie: Re-birth, Marebito, Ju-On: The Grudge, The Grudge), one of the creators and masters of J-horror takes time away from looting his Ju-On series to create something different, and demonstrates he’s still got it. Reincarnation is a tense, taut, supernatural thriller, that may not reach the heights of his best work, but shows there’s still life in Asian horror.

What hasn’t changed is Shimizu’s distain for linear storytelling. Any scene could be happening now in “reality” or thirty years ago. It could be a dream, a hallucination, a haunting, part of the movie they’re making, or a clip from an old 8mm reel documenting the original murders. Is that confusing? How about that any of those things can influence any of the others? We’ve got a direct connection (I’d say causal connection, but I have no reason to believe that Shimizu accepts causation) between a haunting and an event on the faux set. There’s a dream that finishes in something close to reality days later. Characters can walk from one reality to another, and often do. Don’t try to apply structured logic or a timeline, you’ll only hurt yourself.

After the dizzying plot, Reincarnation is most memorable for its characters. J-horror/K-horror doesn’t have a good record on creating believable or sympathetic personalities. Too often they’re distancing and unknown, which makes it hard to feel for their plight. Not this time. Nagisa is a real person, if a broken one, and I was caught up in her life. I empathized even more with the college student who had been dreaming for years of a strange hotel and unfortunately took this opportunity to find out what it means. Partly this is due to a script that gave the characters just enough to say, and just the right things, to turn them into people. Partly it’s due to camera work that catches the right moments, but a lot of the credit goes to actors, none of whom I’m familiar with.

What Reincarnation isn’t is Ju-On. It’s unsettling, not frightening. It’s thoughtful, not hysterical. There are no fountains of blood (OK, one little fountain) or babies in a sack.  It builds slowly to a twenty minute brutal climax that’s thoroughly entertaining but won’t give you nightmares. Don’t expect to be shocked, but instead to be impressed, and you’ll have a good time.

Reincarnation was part of the advertising gimmick: After Dark Horrorfest, 8 Films to Die For. The idea was clever. Take a group of low budget horror films that otherwise wouldn’t get a theatrical release and package them as a horror event. All eight movies would play together for one week only. The commercials, which seemed to play every fifteen minutes on late night cable, promised horror too extreme for normal distribution. These were the most frightening, gore-soaked, shock flicks available anywhere. Of course that wasn’t true. Compared to the average R-rated work, the eight are rather tame. They vary from amateurish and boring to clever and joyfully creepy. Reincarnation is a strange fit. However, I’m pleased that it managed at least a brief stay in a theater on this side of the Pacific.

Oct 112005
 
three reels

Gen-Y thrill seekers watch a cursed videotape that kills in 7 days, and then see how long they can hold out before having someone else watch a duplicate, thus breaking the curse.  Jake (Ryan Merriman), an obnoxious high school student, is drawn in by the college crowd to play this dangerous game, but when the person who is supposed to watch his copy refuses, Jake becomes desperate.

A 16-minute short film that bridges The Ring and The Ring 2, Rings is a creepy vision of where The Ring 2 should have gone.  As a comment on current society, Rings is exceptionally dark.  The characters range from unpleasant and moronic to deeply unpleasant and nearly brain dead.  These are the folks you wish you could avoid all your life, and yet I see them everywhere.  If you are misanthropic, this is your film.

The lovely cynicism is diluted by unnecessary quick cuts and a distracting, “guerilla-style” look, but the theme is strong enough to win out and make a watchable short.  It is, however, a voyeuristic film.  I never felt pulled in as I lacked concern for the characters (since they are such lovely people…).  That works for the message, but isn’t the best way to provoke fear.

Rings finds a new angle on the cursed tape, and is the only film in the multinational Ring series worth seeking out after the original Ringu/Ring Virus/The Ring.