Oct 041940
 

Road to Singapore (1940) four reels
Road to Zanzibar (1941) four reels
Road to Morocco (1942) five reels
Road to Utopia (1945) four reels
Road to Rio (1947) three reels
Road to Bali (1952) 3,5 reels
The Road to Hong Kong (1962) three reels

The ultimate comic buddy team, Bob Hope and Bing Crosby were stars in their own right (yeah, if you are reading film reviews, you already know that), but really shown when tossed together.  Crosby’s drug-like relaxed style was a perfect counterpoint to Hope’s frenetic persona.  They appeared on each others radio shows multiple times and if one starred in a film, there was a good chance the other would pop up in a cameo.

In 1940, after the project was turned down by Fred MacMurray and Jack Oakie (I can’t even imagine…) and George Burns and Gracie Allen, Hope and Crosby were enlisted to head off toward Singapore.  They never made it, in the film anyway, but they made cinema history.  With a huge success and a new kind of comedy on their hands, the studio was happy to make more of the same.

Parodies of popular adventure films, the Road Pictures follow a formula.  Hope and Crosby always play the same characters.  They are given different names, but the personalities don’t change.  Crosby is the confident, suave, ladies man, with a great deal of larceny in his heart but little money in his pocket.  Hope portrays the cowardly fool who is equally dishonest and equally poor.  With few minor variations, each picture starts with them trying to eke out a living as performers, with Crosby tricking Hope into some dangerous stunt.  Due to money or women problems, the two go on the run, ending up in some exotic local.  Along the way they meet Dorothy Lamour, a beautiful and mysterious woman with some problem the boys end up having to solve, no matter how much they try to avoid it.  There’s also a villain or two, and while our “heroes” occasionally fight, more often, they run.  Romance sparks between Crosby and Lamour, though Hope tends to believe that he is the object of her affections.  This leads to numerous back-stabbings, though they all work together more often than not.

The films have four to six songs each, including a ballad for Crosby, a solo number for Lamour, and a comic duet for Hope and Crosby.  Some of the songs are integrated into the story, but just as often, they are dropped in out of nowhere.

After the first picture, the movies become self-referential (or series-referential).  Numerous gags are repeated and part of the fun is to see how they pop up this time.  The most famous is the patty-cake routine, where Hope and Crosby distract guards or attackers by playing the game until they get in a good punch.  Repeated references are made to the stars’ other work (radio shows, musical singles, etc.), to the motion picture company, and to competing actors.  There are also many topical references, making some of the humor out of reach to anyone born after the ’40s.  Supposedly, many of the lines were adlibbed, but in reality, both Hope and Crosby used staff writers to created their off-the-cuff dialog.

The Road Pictures make up one of the finest comedic series.  Even the weakest installment is worth your time, and the best ones are classics.


Road to  Singapore (1940) four reels

Josh (Bing Crosby) is the heir to a shipping fortune and Ace (Bob Hope) is his disreputable friend.  When both find themselves railroaded into marriage, they take off for the islands.  At a small bar on the isle of Kaigoon (not Singapore) they pick up local dancer Mima (Dorothy Lamour) and brawl with her whip-wielding partner Caesar (Anthony Quinn).  Both the boys vie for Mima’s affections, doing their best to ruin the other’s chances.  While Josh seems to have the advantage, he has the added problem that his fiancĂ©e (Judith Barrett) and father (Charles Coburn ) have located him and plan to bring him home.

The straightest of the seven Road Pictures, Road to Singapore is a parody of South Sea Island romantic adventure films, but it is also a romantic adventure film in its own right.  Hope and Crosby keep in character.  Yes, those characters are familiar, but this time they never claim to be a couple actors in a movie.  The fourth wall isn’t broken, and the only “external” reference is a line in a song: “I’m in there pitching for Paramount.”  It is the only one of the Road Pictures that attempts to get the audience emotionally involved…though not too involved (and it succeeds)

I might be making this sound too serious.  It’s not.  Jokes take precedence and there are plenty of them.  Hope is as quick as ever, rattling off one-liners rapid fire.  Crosby keeps up, and between the two of them, only the musical interludes will give you a chance to breathe.  Lamour doesn’t add anything to the comedy, but she does bring sexapeal.  This is Lamour at her most stunning, every man’s island fantasy.

The songs are some of the best in the series, generally fitting the tone of the action (instead of being a break for 1940s pop).  Captain Custard and Sweet Potato Piper are hummable, and The Moon and the Willow Tree is beautifully melodic, wistfully conjuring up faraway lands.

Road to Singapore is not the best of the seven, but if you can only get a hold of two, this should be one of them because it is the anchor for the others.


Road to Zanzibar (1941) four reels

Fearless Frazier (Bob Hope) and Chuck Reardon (Bing Crosby) are on the run in Africa, after their human bullet routine burns down a carnival.  When an eccentric millionaire (Eric Blore) gets them out of a jam, Chuck buys a bogus diamond mine from him with all their hard-earned cash.  When Fearless re-sells it to some thugs, the pair are once again on the run.  “500 miles from nowhere” they are tricked by Donna Latour (Dorothy Lamour) into taking her and her friend Julia (Una Merkel) across Africa so Donna can marry yet another millionaire.  Of course the boys fall for Donna, Donna falls for Chuck, songs are song, and cannibals pop up, all on the road to Zanzibar.

With the success of Road to Singapore, it was inevitable that the boys would be back on the road again, and quite quickly.  This time it’s a spoof of jungle pictures, complete with natives and a man in an obvious gorilla suit.

The structure of Road to Zanzibar copies Singapore closely, but the comedy is broader.  Things are still sedate compared to the entries yet to come, but already, the illusion that Hope and Crosby are playing characters specific to this film is fading.  They’re just Hope and Crosby, doing their normal patter.  Certainly this works, but it makes Zanzibar an intermediate film: too wild to feel any concern for the action, not zany enough to accept it all as a series of gags.  Again, the forth wall remains intact, though Hope does directly comment on Road to Singapore (when their patty-cake gimmick doesn’t work, he observes that their opponent must have seen the last picture).

While Hope and Crosby’s characters have changed only in degree, Lamour’s is quite different.  This time out she’s a good-hearted swindler, not the innocent fantasy-vision.  She would stick close to this persona for the rest of the films.

The songs are pleasant, provided you like 1940s pop, but it’s doubtful you’ll be singing them after the film’s over.  Crosby’s requisite balled “It’s Always You” is the most memorable though I can’t recall the melody a mere hour after hearing it.  He’s in particularly fine form, showing off his vocal range.

I’ve seen Road to Zanzibar many times over the years and have always enjoyed it, but when naming the top movies in the series, it’s always remained in the pack.


Road to Morocco (1942) five reels

Turkey (Bob Hope) and Jeffrey (Bing Crosby) find themselves marooned in Morocco without food or money.  Jeffrey sells Turkey into slavery, but he ends up in the hands of Princess Shalmar (Dorothy Lamour), who intends to marry him for her own nefarious purpose.  Her fiancé, Mullay Kasim, the desert sheik (Anthony Quinn), is none to happy with this turn of events, nor is Jeffrey once he finds them.  This leads to crossed romances, dancing girls, magic rings, and the rarity of Hope getting a girl.

We’re off on the road to Morocco.
This camel is tough on the spine.
Where they’re goin’, why we’re goin’, how can we be sure?
I’ll lay you eight to five that we’ll meet Dorothy Lamour.

Off on the road to Morocco.
Hang on till the end of the line.
I hear this country’s where they do the dance of the seven veils.
We’d tell you more but we would have the censor on our tails.

With Road to Morocco, the format was perfected.  Generally considered the best of The Road Pictures and my favorite (for what it’s worth, the U.S. government agrees, selecting it for the National Film Registry), it is as close to flawless as any comedy.  Moving at a lighting pace, Morocco piles gag on top of gag, with only the better than average songs breaking up the humor.

Since everyone watching in ’42 (and anyone now who is taking the films in order) knew what to expect, there is no attempt to pretend otherwise.  Instead, the viewer is invited to share in the fun.  It isn’t just Bob and Bing that are off on the road to Morocco; it’s us as well.  The stars talk to the audience, refer to past jokes, and generally let everyone know that it’s all just for laughs.

For any villains we may meet, we haven’t any fears.
Paramount will protect us ’cause we’re signed for five more years

The comedy couldn’t be broader.  Within minutes of the opening, the boys are stuck on a raft and Crosby is already talking about eating Hope.  Yup, this movie starts with cannibalism jokes.  From there we head off to homoerotism, whipping, and talking camels.  While a few of the lines may be lost on people not up on ’40s pop-culture, it isn’t a problem as there’s always another joke coming.

Road to Morocco was hysterical sixty-five years ago and it still is today.  It’s the reason why theaters need to show older films as it is a real joy with a crowd.  If you aren’t lucky enough to have such a theater near you, pick up the DVD and have a video-watching party with all your friends.


Road to Utopia (1945) four reels


Duke and Chester (Bing Crosby, Bob Hope) find themselves in snow-covered Alaska, disguised as killers and carrying a stolen treasure map. The real owner of the map, Skagway Sal (Dorothy Lamour), attempts to seduce the map from them. The local gangster, Ace Larson (Douglass Dumbrille), and the killers, Sperry and McGurk, also want the map, and their way of getting it is much less pleasant.

One of the most popular Road Pictures, Road to Utopia has a slightly more leisurely pace than its sprinting predecessor, more along the lines of Zanzibar, but keeps the same level of madcap absurdity.  Fish and bears chat, a mountain transforms into the Paramount logo, and a magician from a different picture walks through the set.  Hope and Crosby could do their patter in their sleep at this point, but don’t, keeping the energy high and the jokes always coming.

Humorist Robert Benchley, popular in the ’30s and ’40s for his short films, appears periodically in a corner of the screen to “explain” the story.  It’s an amusing bit, though I suspect it was a scream to movie goers in ’45.

The songs aren’t up to Morocco‘s standards, but are still above average for the series.  Lamour’s cute and sexy Personality is the one you’ll most likely want to hear again.  The Hope/Crosby duet Put it There, Pal, is also good fun—not really a song, but one of their quick, gag-laden conversations done to a tune.

Road to Utopia is a fine follow-up to Morocco.

(I have a previous, standalone review of Road to Utopia here.)


Road to Rio (1947) three reels

Hot Lips Barton (Bob Hope) and Scat Sweeney (Bing Crosby) are down-on-their-luck performers, run out of town after town due to Scat’s inappropriate advances toward local women.  Stowing-away on an ocean liner, they meet the lovely Lucia Maria de Andrade (Dorothy Lamour) who’s under the hypnotic control of the evil Catherine Vail (Gale Sondergaard).  Naturally, the boys must save themselves as well as Lucia and find a bit of romance along the way.

By this fifth entry in the series, the always familiar jokes have become a little too familiar.  Sure, much of the humor comes from seeing how the old situations will pop up this time, but there is a point of limiting returns.  Yes, it’s funny to see the patty-cake punch gag (used twice), but not quite as funny as it had been in the previous four outings.

In an attempt at a little variation in the format, the “wackiness” is toned down…slightly…from the heights of Morocco and Utopia.  Bing and Bob only blatantly break the forth wall once and have fewer references to it just being a motion picture; fewer means there are some, which play well due to their rarity.  The longest Road Picture, Rio  has the most coherent and linear plot since Singapore.  The boys set out to evade the bad guys and save Dorothy, and are only sidetracked once, when they get a job as an American band in Rio.  This diversion includes the best gag in the picture as they try and pass off three non-English-speaking locals as hip-cat Americans by teaching each a single phrase.

Usually, a few of the always-present songs halt the story while a couple keep things going and are part of the humor.  This time, all the music grinds things to a halt.  The tunes are all generic 1940s pop; you won’t need to buy the soundtrack.  You Don’t Have to Know the Language, sung by Bing and The Andrew Sisters, is as close to a standout as you’ll find, and it’s not all that close.  The Andrew Sisters were a popular war-time trio, but their attraction has not held up over the years and younger viewers aren’t likely to be impressed.

Gale Sondergaard, best known as Inez Quintero in The Mark of Zorro, is a welcome addition to the cast.  She doesn’t have much to do, and plays her part straight, but manages to add in a touch of appealing evil.

The Road Pictures are all good fun, and there’s nothing wrong with Rio. It just isn’t the equal of others in the franchise.


Road to Bali (1952) 3,5 reels

George (Bing Crosby) and Harold (Bob Hope), on the run from a pair of shotgun weddings, take jobs as deep sea divers for Ken-Arok, an island prince (Murvyn Vye).  The island is ruled by his cousin, Princess Lala (Dorothy Lamour), and with the sunken treasure  he’s hired the boys to recover, he plans to depose Lala.  Obviously, his intensions for our two heroes don’t involve them surviving, and just as obviously, they don’t notice as the fight over Lala.

We’re back to the South Seas in the sixth installment of the Road Pictures, and it’s once again fertile ground.  The team apparently has more one-liners for islands, native dancing girls, and love-starved gorillas than they do for commercial trips to South America.  They’ve also returned to (or even surpassed) Morocco‘s level of absurdity, with a magic rope, a basket that produces beautiful girls, and a talking volcano.  They joke about Paramount Pictures (again), Errol Flynn (who screams from off stage because Bing and Bob are getting so many babes), and Crosby’s advancing age.  Bing’s brother Bob, the curvaceous Jane Russell, Humphrey Bogart, and Dean Martin and Jerry Lewis all make improbable cameos as themselves.  The fourth wall is in ruins.  Hope repeatedly makes helpful suggestions to the audience, but I’ll skip the details as those are the film’s best gags.  Road to Bali is, on a joke-by-joke scale, the funniest Road Picture, which, depending on one’s taste, makes it one of the funniest films ever made.

It is also the best looking Road Picture.  The only one in color (lush Technicolor), the obviously stage-bound jungles and ancient structures make me want to ship out to the Pacific tomorrow.

Since I don’t rate this as highly as Morocco, the observant reader should be waiting for the “but…”  And here it is: the musical numbers.  The music isn’t horrible…overall.  Moonflowers, Lamour’s tone-setting ballad, isn’t half bad.  But the execution of all the songs is uncomfortable and their integration into the story is incompetent, or just lazy.  A little too old to be winging it, Hope and Crosby often look like your accountant neighbor on karaoke night.  I have to wonder if they did any blocking for the songs or if everyone just walked on stage and then moved around randomly.

At their best, the numbers come off as dated.  Anyone under the age of thirty is going to moan, as are most of those over it.

It’s remarkable for an entry so late in a franchise to be this good.  But the franchise was getting old by ’52.  The stars weren’t young any more, nor were the jokes (good, but not young).

Road to Bali is out of copyright, so low-rent DVD companies have put out numerous poor quality versions, sometimes just using an old VHS tape.  I can’t say how many are bad, but without more info, I wouldn’t chance it, and pick up the Brentwood one which is good.


The Road to Hong Kong (1962) three reels

Conmen Harry (Bing Crosby) and Chester (Bob Hope) are plying their trade in India when Chester is injured.  The two journey to see a Tibetan Lama to cure Chester’s amnesia, and while there, swipe an herb that gives the user the ability to remember whatever he sees.  Diane (Joan Collins), an agent of an evil organization, mistakenly slips Chester the recipe for their new rocket fuel, and its those plans the boys use to try out their new “memory act.”  With the papers destroyed, the secret is only in Chester’s head, and Diane and her boss (Robert Morley) will stop at nothing to get that information.  Luckily, Dorothy Lamour is touring Hong Kong, so she can help our hapless heroes.

After a ten year absence, Hope and Crosby are back on the road, this time to nostalgia.  The road is warm and inviting for old fans, but it has little to offer on its own.  Though the two old pros have slowed down, they can still rattle off a lot of jokes in ninety-minutes, but none are laugh-out-loud funny.  This is a movie that may make you smile at old friends, but any real laughs will be from remembering how they were.

Espionage pics were ripe for spoofing, but the story never jells—not necessarily a problem as plot is an after thought in the Road Picture.  But they also don’t find good gags for the topic, instead writing the same insults and girl-chasing routines that have been done six times before.

The Road to Hong Kong introduces several unwanted changes, besides putting “The” in the title.  It returns the franchise to b&w.  After Road to Balis appealing use of Technicolor, the movie looks drab.  Compounding that is the poorer quality of the film stock compared to what was used in the ’40s, lacking the contrast that marked Singapore and Morocco.  Far more noticeable is the demotion of Dorothy Lamour.  Deemed too old at the time to be Bing and Bob’s sexual fantasy, Joan Collins got the role.  Collins is certainly attractive, and does a reasonable job, but has little chemistry with the pair.  Yes, Lamour was a bit older than in her prime “sarong” years, but she was still eleven years younger than Hope and Crosby, and would have been more believable with the two near-sixty-year-olds.  She was also a far more accomplished singer (not that  Hong Kong should be remembered for its songs, no matter who sung them).  When she balked at her cameo, Lamour’s part was enlarged, but she’s still a minor player.

Once again the forth wall is torn down and there are a torrent of self-referential remarks.  Unfortunately, the wild, zany fun of breaking the rules that was the hallmark of Morocco and Bali comes off as silly here.  The third time the duo calls on the special effects department to get them out of a jam, I was shaking my head, not laughing.

This review sounds negative, but that’s only because I’m comparing Hong Kong to the other Road Pictures.  With lesser competition, it would stand up better to scrutiny.  But then the only reason to watch this one is because it is part of such a fine series.  It’s enjoyable, and isn’t an embarrassment, which is pretty good for a seventh film.

Oct 041940
 
two reels

Three old men (Charles Winninger, C. Aubrey Smith and Harry Carey), with nothing to do for Christmas, toss three wallets into the snow, hoping that whoever finds them will return them and stay for dinner.  It works in two cases, reeling in a young girl and a down-on-his-luck Texan (Richard Carlson) who find each other attractive.  The five become close, but the three old men die in a plane crash, leaving their ghosts to watch the young couple fall apart.

There is a lot of potential here; it is also creepy.  The Dickens’ oriented Christmas cheer is visible, but a lighter hand was needed to make it come to life.  The first part works nicely as the focus is on the peculiarities of the elderly men.  Watching excellent character actors like Smith, Winninger, and Carey is always worth the time.  Plus, there is Maria Ouspenskaya (the gypsy woman in The Wolf Man) as a servant, an actress that makes any picture better.

But things go wrong quickly when the older actors take a back seat to the younger ones.  The love story is neither romantic nor thoughtful.  And the film takes a cruel twist for a feel-good Christmas flick.  It is fairly vicious toward one of the characters, a starlet who gets in the way of the romance.  It turns out she has no soul at all simply because she’s a starlet.  On this world view, might I suggest a simple farming life is the way to go.

The afterlife is a strange place, with rather strict rules.  But the rules can all be broken because God is easily influenced.  Someone just has to ask.  I guess the lesson here is make sure you have a friend who can ask God to fix things because God won’t do it on his own.  This is not an afterlife I’d like to see.

Outside of asking God for favors, there isn’t much for a ghost to do, which is disappointing in a fantasy film filled with ghosts.

Also known as Beyond Christmas.

Sep 121940
 
two reels
rebecca

Rich and imposing widower, Maxim de Winter (Laurence Olivier) quickly marries a lower class introvert (Joan Fontaine). The Second Mrs. de Winter—that’s the only name she’s given—has problems fitting in at Manderley, his ancient estate, and is constantly doubting herself, afraid that her husband can only love his dead first wife, Rebecca. Mrs. Danvers (Judith Anderson), obsessed with Rebecca, encourages her fears to the point of suggesting she kill herself. This gothic melodrama continues for two-thirds of the film until the new wife discovers that things are not at all as she had assumed.

I’m not sure if it is fitting to review Rebecca as part of my “Overrated Movies” collection as it no longer seems to have that good of a reputation. It isn’t hated, but it seems to be an also-ran on critics’ lists of Alfred Hitchcock projects. A quick look at a dozen such lists shows it always outside of the top 10 (granted, those top films are lofty company, but Rebecca needs such company if it really deserved to beat The Philadelphia Story and His Girl Friday to the Oscar). Rebecca tends to sit in the middle ground, between the director’s classics and failures, which is where I put it. Hitchcock himself was none-too-fond of it. David O Selznick wanted it his way (he always did) and played with the script, and recut the film to his own liking, filming additional scenes and re-recording dialog and making a mishmash of it. At least Hitchcock managed to substitute the over-the-top close-up of the letter “R” on a burning bed over Selznick’s choice of the ridiculous “R” appearing in the smoke. Hitchcock dismissed the film and changed his shooting style to make it more difficult for producers to mangle his work in the future.

Rebecca is a rip-off of Jane Eyre, both as a novel and a film, though amusingly, the ’43 adaptation of Jane Eyre takes its look from the ’40 Rebecca. In both we have our lower class girl tossed into a gothic mansion with a dashing but troubled widower. She loves him and he may love her. Reminders of the dead wife are everywhere and it seems like her spirit is darkening the lives of all involved. The housekeeper is fanatically devoted to the ghost and dislikes the intrusion of the young woman. And there is a mystery involving that first wife and her death. Rebecca functions because of the similarity. Jane Eyre has an unusual answer for its mystery (yes, spoilers for Jane Eyre ahead) in that the first wife isn’t dead. Since Rebecca apes much of Jane Eyre, it leaves the audience asking what it wouldn’t otherwise: Is the first Mrs. de Winter actually gone? And it is the possibility that she isn’t that drives the tension. Without that, there would be nothing but a depressing character study for the first hour. What we’ve got here is a “make your own mystery” story, where Jane Eyre goes one way and Rebecca another.

The strange thing is that Rebecca just lets all the tension go at the two-thirds mark. The story ends, and then a new story begins. Up to that point it is all fog and rain and doom and despair and doubt. Then all of that goes away and we jump into a conventional police procedural. The final act isn’t bad, though the tonal shift can give you whiplash. It doesn’t help that the censors demanded a much more unlikely and emotionally bland back-story than the one in the book, one that makes it difficult to figure why de Winter didn’t solve most of the problems early on by speaking to his new wife.

Plot holes abound (Why didn’t de Winter fire Mrs. Danvers some time ago?) and the story doesn’t hold together well, but most of those failings are hidden in all that fog. The sudden personality alterations are a bit harder to take. Still, as a whole, Rebecca is mildly entertaining and I rank it best of the trilogy of gothic romances of the time, Rebecca, Jane Eyre, and Wuthering Heights. But if you want classic gothic romance, two supernatural films rise high over any of these. 1943 would see the release of I Walked With a Zombie, based on Jane Eyre, and ’44 would give us The Uninvited, which discreetly borrows from Rebecca. Both are masterpieces.

Most of Rebecca’s 11 Oscar nominations are undeserved, as is the win for best picture. Some are embarrassing, like the three for acting. I have to wonder if it was Selznick that let the acting become so uncontrolled as it isn’t Hitchcock’s style; it does remind me of Gone With the Wind, which had Selznick’s fingerprints all over it. Olivier, Fontaine, and Anderson are in melodrama-mode, playing everything too broadly. If de Winter is in a brooding mood, you’ll know it. Likewise every time Wife 2 is frightened, Fontaine does her best to announce that to people outside the theater walking by in the streets. And Anderson only needs a mustache to twirl to be Snidely Whiplash. The director’s nomination didn’t impress Hitchcock, nor me, and the special effects haven’t aged well, making that nom into a joke. The score is fine and the nominations for art direction and cinematography (which it won) are legitimate.

So Rebecca, once thought of as a great picture, is now seen as a good one, or in my case, a fair one. It’s shot well enough. It looks pretty. And the hammy acting doesn’t ruin what is a silly story to begin with. Watch it, or don’t watch it. It isn’t worth the energy to promote one choice over the other.

Sep 031940
 
four reels

General Gurko Lanen (George Sanders) controls Lichtenburg with an iron fist, holding the Grand Duchess Zona (Joan Bennett) as his prisonser. Edmund Dantes Jr. (Louis Hayward), son of the famous Count of Monte Cristo, masquerading as a foppish banker, comes to free the beautiful Zona and lead a revolution.

A second tier Swashbuckler, The Son of Monte Cristo is a fun, action romp, low on sense but high on heroics. Owing nothing to its excellent predecessor, The Count of Monte Cristo, The Son follows the basic story of The Scarlet Pimpernel and The Mark of Zorro. There’s lot of gags as Dantes flounces about, pretending to be a fool and coward, and an equal number of sword duels, plus all the leaping and fast talking that mark Swashbucklers. That none of it lives up to the heights of The Adventures of Robin Hood should not be held against it. This is a smaller scale production, with no large sets and a cast that is a bit meager to represent the population of even a tiny country.

Director Rowland V. Lee had a fine Swashbuckling pedigree, having previously made The Count of Monte Cristo (1934), and The Three Musketeers (1935). His two leads had appeared together in The Man in the Iron Mask (1939) and had sufficient chemistry for the love-at-first-sight plot. Hayward had mixed success in his multiple sword epics, but is charming here. Bennett is even better, even if her roll is the generic damsel in distress.

George Sanders makes an excellent villain, and his Gen Lanen is a surprisingly sympathetic one. He’s a commoner, with pride in his past and a desire to be more. He’s smart, strong, and shows a real affection for Zona. It’s not at all clear that he wouldn’t have made as good a ruler as a hereditary queen. But he has enough of a vicious streak to make him the bad guy, and we are in white hat/black hat moral territory.

The bit parts are filled by solid old Hollywood players, including Montagu Love (The Prisoner of Zenda, The Adventures of Robin Hood, The Man in the Iron Mask, The Sea Hawk, The Mark of Zorro), Ian Wolfe (You Can’t Take it With You, The Invisible Man’s Revenge, Witness for the Prosecution), and the Lone Ranger himself, Clayton Moore.

This is Saturday afternoon fair, with no more meaning than “bravery is good” and “fight for what is right.” Take it for what it is, and I can’t imagine you won’t have a good time. I’ve seen it easily ten times and it never gets old.

Haywood also appeared in the Swashbucklers The Man in the Iron Mask, The Return of Monte Cristo, The Black Arrow, The Masked Pirate, Fortunes of Captain Blood, Lady in the Iron Mask, and Captain Pirate.

Back to Swashbucklers

Aug 241940
 
five reels

The Sea Hawk is a well-filmed, well-acted adventure yarn of pseudo-pirates and romance on the high seas, based, in name only, on a Rafael Sabatini novel.  Errol Flynn plays privateer Geoffrey Thorpe with the charisma and bravado that was his trademark in the 30s and 40s.  For two hours, we are taken into the Swashbuckling world where Thorpe and his loyal crew of misfits sink Spanish ships, free English galley slaves, attack a gold caravan, and foil a traitor’s plans, all for Queen and country.  It’s all great fun, and very familiar.

There’s not much new in The Sea Hawk, but then there’s not much wrong either.  This is Captain Blood, all grown up, or Robin Hood at sea.  There is nothing wrong with repeating something that worked, as originality isn’t the only factor that makes a movie worthwhile.

With that in mind, I can’t critique The Sea Hawk without referencing its two older brothers.  Almost everyone who worked on it had worked in the genre before and knew exactly what to do.  The cast nearly matches that of The Adventures of Robin Hood.  Brenda Marshall takes over for Olivia de Havilland as the proud maiden and love interest and does a more believable job.  The only other major switch is Henry Daniell as arch-villain Lord Wolfingham instead of Robin Hood‘s Basil Rathbone and the film suffers for it.  Daniell does a passable job as a run-of-the-mill villain, but he lacks the spark that made Guy of Gisbourne memorable.  It is hard to take seriously Wolfingham as a suitable foe for Thorpe in the final swordfight, and it doesn’t help that Curtiz makes that fight a look-a-like to the great Robin/Gisbourne fight, even down to repeating the fencing shadows.

Other comparisons turn out better for The Sea Hawk.  The early sea battle is spectacular, far surpassing what Captain Bloodhad to offer.  And there is the music.  This is Korngold at his finest.  It is stirring.  After listening for a few minutes, I wanted to go sink some Spanish ships myself, and I’m pretty much a pacifist.

Warner’s decision to film in b&w was unfortunate.  With its fantasy world of detailed ships and elaborate costumes, The Sea Hawk would have benefited from color, the kind of Technicolor used in Robin Hood.  But Curtiz knew how to use b&w; the scene where Dona Maria stands by the harbor watching the ship leave is haunting.

Historically, there was more to do with 1940s England and its fight against the Nazis than with 1585 and the Spanish.  This was a wartime film, and that set it apart from its brothers.  It is darker.  The heroes have to sacrifice more in their fight—the galley scenes are played quite seriously—just as the English people are being told they will have to in order to defeat the Germans.  Queen Elisabeth’s final patriotic speech was a call to arms to a country at war 400 years out of time.

 Reviews, Swashbucklers Tagged with:
Aug 061940
 
two reels

An eccentric scientist (John Barrymore) invents an invisibility machine and puts in ad in the paper for a volunteer subject.  The volunteer turns out to be an adventurous female model, Kitty Carroll (Virginia Bruce).  Soon, mobsters are interested in the machine, and the scientist’s playboy patron  (John Howard) is interested in the girl.

Outside of someone becoming invisible, this slight, romantic comedy has no connection to its namesakes.  Invisibility doesn’t come from a serum nor does it cause insanity.  Instead it comes from a whirling, buzzing machine that would fit into any comedic, mad scientist’s lab.  The invisibility device does cause the subject to crave alcohol, thus precipitating plenty of drunken gags.

As the subject is a woman, there’s a lot of focus on her nudity (she’s invisible, not her clothing).  How else were you going to get a naked girl in a movie in 1940?

It’s not a bad farce, and everyone in it gives amusing performances, including Margaret Hamilton (the Wicked Witch in The Wizard of Oz), Charlie Ruggles, and Shemp Howard (of The Three Stooges), but “amusing” is about as strong a complement as I can come up with.  Even by 1940, the invisibility jests were old hat, with Cary Grant  and Constance Bennett pulling them off better three years earlier in Topper.  While I watched, I found nothing to complain about, nor to cheer at, nor even laugh.  I smiled on occasion.  If I smile is all you want, this will do.

Back to Mad ScientistsBack to Classic Horror

Jul 081940
 
three reels

Out-of-work archaeologists Steve Banning (Dick Foran) and Babe Jenson (Wallace Ford) discover the location of the tomb of princess Ananka. With funds from stage magician Solvani (Cecil Kellaway) and his daughter, Marta (Peggy Moran), they set out into the desert. But the tomb is guarded by an ancient cult, and the priest has the power to animate the mummy Kharis.

The second of Universal’s Mummy films, The Mummy’s Hand is not a sequel to 1932’s The Mummy, but a reworking of the Mummy concept, and the first of the four-film Kharis series (the others being The Mummy’s Tomb, The Mummy’s Ghost, and The Mummy’s Curse).  The clichĂ©s that dominated mummy films till 1999 came from The Mummy’s Hand.  There is the slow moving, mute, bandaged mummy, the controlling priest and magic tana leaves, and the curse on anyone who enters the Princess’ tomb.

The tone is a change from other Universal monster movies, being more of a romantic comedy for the first half, with Marta first disliking, then respecting, and finally loving Steve Banning.  Foran and Ford come off as a toned down, mildly amusing but not funny, Abbott and Costello.  It makes for an uneven picture.

Always-good character actor Cecil Kellaway elevates the proceedings and, unlike Ford, is funny.  George Zucco is also a step above the leads and makes a rather silly villain enjoyable.  The cast is rounded out by Tom Tyler in his only appearance as the Mummy.  Lon Chaney Jr. would take over the role for the other Kharis films.  Tyler was suffering from arthritis so badly that even the Mummy’s shambling was too much for him.  His makeup was excellent; later films would use a mask.

Take this as rip-roaring, Saturday afternoon adventure fare.  It’s fun, but not to be taken seriously.

Back to MummiesBack to Classic Horror

Jul 061940
 
three reels

Framed for his brother’s murder, Geoffrey Radcliffe (Vincent Price) is saved from the gallows by his fiancĂ©e, Helen Manson (Nan Grey), and Dr. Frank Griffin (John Sutton), brother of the original Invisible Man, who supply Geoffrey with the invisibility serum. Geoffrey escapes and searches for the real killer, knowing that it won’t be long before the drug drives him insane. The most likely suspect is Richard Cobb (Cedric Hardwicke), who wants Helen for himself.

As sequels go, The Invisible Man Returns is pretty good, but it is a shadow of its predecessor, and like most sequels, the whole thing feels unnecessary. Price’s voice lacked the power it would have in later years, but it was distinct enough to make him a good choice for the faceless lead. Cecil Kellaway, a too often forgotten character actor, also supplied personality to the feature as the police inspector, but the rest of the cast does not fare as well. Hardwicke fails to find anything to do with his underwritten part, Grey is forgettable while she’s on screen, and Sutton manages to be bland and overact at the same time.

Director Joe May tries to strike the same balance of dark comedy and horror that James Whale’s managed in The Invisible Man, but he lacks Whale’s skill and quirky nature, and instead fails to put anything on either side of the scale. The screenplay is of no help, focusing on a mystery that the viewer has solved five minutes in.

But, there is still some good Universal monster fun here, with the bandaged man maniacally laughing. No one can do megalomania like Price. The police attempts to grab Radcliffe make for some nice scenes involving smoke and some tricky plans from both sides.

The finest moment falls outside of the plot. A worn and beaten Invisible Man asks a scarecrow to borrow its clothing. It is heartbreaking, and ranks up with Frankenstein’s Monster pleading for understanding and Dracula noting how wonderful real death would be. It made me feel for the monster, as all the best films do.

Back to Mad ScientistsBack to Classic Horror

Jun 211940
 
two reels

Dr. Tim Mason (Roger Pryor) is at the forefront of frozen therapy, but his demonstration promised more than it could deliver, so he and his nurse/fiancĂ©e Judith Blair (Jo Ann Sayers) head to the long abandoned, secluded home of the inventor of frozen therapy, Dr. Leon Kravaal (Boris Karloff). There, in a hidden underground camber they find Kravaal, frozen. They thaw him and he returns to life, telling the story of how a greedy heir to Kravaal’s experimental patient and foolish authorities interrupted his experiments and they all ended up frozen. Now that Kravall’s awake, he sets out to warm up the others, who, upon regaining consciousness, immediately threaten Kravaal and destroy his research. Kravaal is greatly upset by this setback and decides to experiment on them.

The intro text, that discusses research in “frozen therapy,” shows that Hollywood was still uncomfortable with horror and science fiction (this is only a year after horror films had returned). The filmmakers wanted to set it firmly in the real world, while also pretending that it had socially relevant information to pass along. It doesn’t, which should be clear when you know the story was suggested by the work of failed scientist and all around weirdo Robert Cornish, who’d already been the source of one of the worst movies ever made, Life Returns. Unlike Cornish, Kravaal has principles.

The first scene doesn’t help in setting the tone as one doctor goes into “as you know Bob” expository dialog as another pours hot coffee into a patient as a cutting edge procedure. Yes, hot coffee. Not that the criminal justice system looks much better than the medical one, so it’s best to ignore any connection to our world.

And if we do, we get a mild little thriller which is only of interest due to the presence of Karloff, and while far from his best performance, he’s engaging and presents a sympathetic semi-villain. With his sincerity, when Kravaal kills someone, it feels like the right thing to have done. Hell, I’d have been good with sacrificing Tim and Judith to help out Kravaal, which probably shouldn’t be the way I feel, showing the movie is a bit lopsided.

The other actors aren’t bad, and Sayers is very attractive as a nurse who has only two modes: obedient and terrified, but not being bad is not equivalent to being good. When Karloff is off screen, which is for the first third of the picture, Pryor and Sayers have to do the heavy lifting and they can’t manage it, not that they’re given any help.

While Columbia was one of the Little 3, studios, when they went low budget, the result is equivalent to Poverty Row and this is low budget. It looks cheap, with simple camera setups, limited sets that are always shot from the same side, and dialog no one spent a lot of time with. I’m guessing reshoots were rare. No one put in the effort to come up with a new idea. Rather this is a repurposing of Columbia’s previous Karloff mad scientist flick, The Man They Could Not Hang (Columbia seemed to love inaccurate titles as there was no hanging in that one and no nine lives in this one).

Even if I could stomach the rest of the film, the tacked on embarrassing propaganda postscript is too much to take. I can’t say to entirely skip The Man with Nine Lives, since Karloff is good, but know that you’re only watching it for Karloff.

May 241940
 
five reels

One of the standard Swashbuckler plots has the hero masquerading as a fop so his real self can right wrongs and win the maiden, and no film did it better than The Mark of Zorro. Leslie Howard recited doggerel poems as the The Scarlet Pimpernel and Louis Hayward dithered on about banking as The Son of Monte Cristo, but Tyrone Power is on a whole different level as he dreamily expounds on fragrances and fabrics.

What struck me when re-watching The Mark of Zorro recently was how funny it is, and how well it stands up in more cynical times.  While other Swashbucklers, such as The Sea Hawk, Cyrano de Bergerac, and even Robin Hood, take their world view seriously (if not the execution of that view), Zorro winks at the audience.  It’s a tiny bit silly, and it knows it.  Deep down, many of the best Swashbucklers have a  message about life and the nature of good and evil and proper behavior. The Mark of Zorro doesn’t.  Sure, it nods toward doing the right thing and proper morals, but that’s not the point here.  It’s all about action and romance and flashing blades and quick wit—the basis for the genre.  That’s made it feel less dated than the others.

While not as dramatic as The Count of Monte Cristo, or as beautiful as The Adventures of Robin Hood, or as uplifting as The Sea Hawk, or as lyrical as Cyrano de Bergerac, or as witty as The Princess Bride, I think it may be the most fun. Humor is responsible for much of that, but at least as import is pacing. The Mark of Zorro has the best pacing of any Swashbuckler, and I can’t think of a single film of any genre which beats it.  There is not a slow moment.  Humor flows into chases which flow into romance which flows back to humor then on to swordfights.  No time to get up for popcorn.

There are small problems that I could nit-pick, but The Mark of Zorro never gives me the chance.  Later, I can wonder how Zorro happens to be drinking with the banker at the proper time, and why the soldiers can’t shoot into a river, but not while I watch.

The nearly “pretty” Tyrone Power has no problem convincing me that he is the dashing, romantic champion, but it is as the effeminate peacock that he excels. One of the great moments is after a spirited dance; Lolita, out of breath and in awe, says that she has “never dreamed dancing could be so wonderful. Diego, blotting at his face with a lace handkerchief, responds that he “found it rather fatiguing.”

Linda Darnell was an inspired choice for Lolita. She was seventeen, as was her character, with uncommon beauty and grace.  She is all the good things about youth personified, and as such, it isn’t troubling for the film that Diego loves her on sight—I did too.

The rest of the cast is excellent as well.  Swashbucklermainstays Montagu Love and Eugene Pallette play variations on roles they’d perfected.  Gale Sondergaard mixes sympathy and sensuality with unscrupulous social climbing to make Lolita’s aunt, Inez Quintero, a surprisingly engaging character.  Keeping to my view that the villains make the movie, The Mark of Zorro gives us a bumbling, evil alcalde played by J. Edward Bromberg, and an ex-fencing master/strongman played by the greatest portrayer of Swashbuckler villains, Basil Rathbone.  Rathbone adds yet another classic swordfight to his resume.

Alfred Newman’s Zorro theme has stuck with me from childhood.  I wouldn’t have minded a bit more variation in the score, but what’s there is good, so the repetition doesn’t hurt the film.

If the The Adventures of Robin Hood is the first film to see to understand and appreciate Swashbucklers, then The Mark of Zorro is the second.