Sep 261989
 
two reels

Evil Dr. Arcane (Louis Jourdan) is back, somehow, and is searching for immortality. He believes the answer is hidden in the genes of his dippy stepdaughter (Heather Locklear), who likes planets more than people. Can Swamp Thing save the hot chick? I think we know.

Quick Review: So someone thought, “Swamp Thing…Yeah, we need a sequel to that.”

Out goes cult horror director Wes Craven; in comes low-budget skin flick director, Jim Wynorski. I’m sure you’ve all watched his classic The Bare Wench Project. Out as well is Adrienne Barbeau, replaced by Heather Locklear. Also added is Sarah Douglas of Superman II fame. She deserved better. Somehow they managed to keep Louis Jourdan hanging around.

Gone, also, is the horror/EC comic tone. It’s pure comedy; it is live action Robot Chicken. If you are amused by a giant plant-man pulling off a tuber for him and a hot girl to nibble on so they can have psychotropic sex, this is your film. If not, best to skip this one.

 Reviews, Superhero Tagged with:
Sep 031989
 
one reel

Dr. Louis Creed (Dale Midkiff), his wife (Denise Crosby), and their children move to rural Maine where his new neighbor, Jud Crandall (Fred Gwynne), tells Louis about the ancient Indian burial ground that brings the dead back to life.

Quick Review: Video director Mary Lambert decides the way to go with this Stephen King adaptation is to make it both humorless and senseless.  Of course, I don’t want to ignore the foreshadowing of every plot development and the one-dimensional characters.  Here is a film where a little girl’s cat gets run over, and I didn’t care.  Then a toddler gets run over, and I didn’t care.  Shouldn’t a film that’s centered around family loss make me care about these things?  Of course I might care a bit more if these weren’t the stupidest people on Earth, people who are warned about the trucks on the road over and over yet ignore it.  Then, there is the American Werewolf in London-like mutilated ghost.  Must all King films have a voice of God to warn the characters of everything?  The bad makeup/FX doesn’t help either (the toddler zombie is sometimes a plastic doll and the wife’s dying sister is obviously a man).  Fred Gwynne does inject some life into this project, but it’s not enough.  The slow crawl of the film does make it to something fairly creepy in the end, but it is far too late.

Back to Zombies

 Reviews, Zombies Tagged with:
Aug 211989
 
one reel

Spock’s brother and some space hippies want to find God who lives in Eden at the center of the galaxy. Naturally they need a star ship to get there and the Enterprise is the first available one they can take over. Oh, and there’s a punk Klingon following because…reasons.

It is hard not to be cynical about The Search for God, as it is often called. Perhaps William Shatner really was thinking about telling a good story and entertaining the fans. But I can’t get the image out of my head of Shatner jumping up and down yelling, “Look at me!” Leanard Nemoy had directed the two previous installments, and Shatner wanted his turn. Well, he got it.

At least if you are going to mangle a movie, Shatner does it with such foolishness that it can be enjoyed for the sheer spectacle of his ego. Kirk climbs rocks, sings songs, tells bad jokes, and acts both as action hero and as slapstick comic.

Looking and feeling like a weak TV episode rather than a film, the movie seems cheap and tiny. Shatner chose to remake The Way to Eden, perhaps the worst original series ep. The space hippies are now a Vulcan hippy and his religious followers, but they are still looking for Eden. Amazingly he’s managed to make it less sensical than it was forty years earlier.

It’s hard to determine which of horrendous camera angles or ineffectual lighting or the psychology of “everyone has a secret pain” is the worst part of the film. But why choose one when they are all so bad? Shatner even manages a potshot at those damn kids now-a-days on my lawn with their funny clothing and rock-n-roll, in the form of bratty Klingon youths.

The Planet of Galactic Peace being the armpit of the universe is clever and could have been the setting for a smarter tale. Plus, there’s Uhura’s fan dance and the line “What does God need with a starship?” so the film isn’t a complete loss. An embarrassment, certainly, but not a complete loss. Maybe I am a bit severe saying not to see this. When a film is so flamboyantly bad, there is some joy in watching the smoking ruins.

My ranking of all Star Trek movies is here.

Apr 111989
 
one reel

Ray Kinsella (Kevin Costner), an Iowa farmer going through a mid-life crises, hears a voice telling him “If you build it, he will come.”  He takes this to mean he needs to build a baseball field so that the ghost of Shoeless Joe Jackson (Ray Liotta) can come and play baseball.  When eight ghosts show up, he hears a voice telling him to “ease his pain.”  This starts him on a mission to find a now-forgotten writer (James Earl Jones) and a dead doctor (Burt Lancaster).

It’s all very simple: God is an American, life is a baseball game, and you should fight for your dreams, as long as your dreams involve baseball.  Grab your Mom and an apple pie as it is Americana time!

There’s little of sense in Field of Dreams, which isn’t all that problematic.  No explanation is ever given for why the ghosts only come to the field or where they’ve been, why Kinsella is being given this “gift” instead of thousands of others with father issues, or why the messages are overly cryptic, but that’s OK as this is a film about emotion.  Well, the cryptic message bit is annoying the third time it pops up, but let’s not dwell on that.

But back to those emotions.  There isn’t a moment of the film that exists because it flows naturally, makes sense (I already covered the whole “sense” thing), or is part of a story.  Everything is there to manipulate the emotions of the audience, and how much you enjoy  Field of Dreams is based on how successful it is at “tugging on your heart strings” and how forgiving you are of such tactics.  Well, that and how much you like baseball.  You need to like it a lot.

On the tugging side, the film wheels out an arsenal of weeping-inducing weapons:  an unresolved argument with a father, a lost dream, a little girl in jeopardy, a hero who has lost his way, a mean banker, a potential foreclosure, and too many more to name.

Me?  My emotions tend to be hit by actual character development along with tragedies or victories that spring from the story, so I was left watching a whole lot of empty filmmaker games.  Plus, I’ve never considered selling my soul for a chance to play in the big leagues, which is the degree of fanaticism required to buy into the movie.

For a time, when Ray is following clues to find what it all means, it looks like the film is going to become a mystery and I had hopes of something interesting being discovered.  It’s silly to hope.  Soon after, actual story is replaced by the message that you need to love your father while you can (oh, and love is shown through playing catch).  Sigh.

Then there are the speeches.  Lots and lots of speeches.  I actually enjoyed the film when someone wasn’t making a speech (ah, such brief moments).  As the film progresses, the number of speeches increase and I had to wonder if there is some critical mass for speeches where the celluloid will explode, eradiating us with “message” particles.  If so, the blast should have occurred when James Earl Jones recites that the one constant in life is baseball and that it reminds us of all in life that is good.  Ummmm.  Yeah.

As for the acting, it isn’t bad in general.  Jones, Lancaster, and Liotta are as believable as anyone could be.  Timothy Busfield, playing the unnecessary bad guy, is shrill; that’s it, just shrill.  Amy Madigan, as “The Wife,” does the best she can with a dismal role, complete with an otherwise pointless scene where she battles against local book censors so we can see what a little firebrand she really is (shucks!).  As for Costner, he uses all of his talent, once again demonstrating that Keanu Reeves is a national treasure and master thespian.  I have no idea how a man can yell, and still not change the tone of his voice, but that is the magic that is Costner.

The film has a few amusing moments (the ghosts playing ball) along with some particularly embarrassing ones (Ray’s tantrum) but they all blend together into a schmaltz smoothie filled with enough saccharine to choke Frank Capra.  Drink up and play ball!

Back to Ghost Stories

 Ghost Stories, Reviews Tagged with:
Feb 251989
 
five reels

Photographer Vicki Vale (Kim Basinger) arrives in Gotham City to cover the story of the mysterious masked vigilantly know as The Bat. She also meets eccentric millionaire Bruce Wayne (Michael Keaton), who has begun his secret crusade against crime as Batman. Shortly thereafter, psychotic killer Jack Napier (Jack Nicholson) falls into a vat of toxic chemicals, which makes him even more crazy and adopt the name Joker. The Joker starts a bizarre crime wave that only Batman can stop.

Batman is a gothic wonderland, a dream or nightmare, depending on your predilections. It is a triumph of art design, at the very top of the cinematic form. On that basis alone, it is a great film and one of the best superhero films ever made. Other attempts at Gotham have either been tacky (Schumacher) or dull (Nolan). This is beautiful and twisted. Tim Burton has a style. It doesn’t always work. Here it is perfect.

When I saw this film in 1989, it was amazing. Now, 25+ years on, it is iconic. Scene after scene have become part of pop culture: The chat with the dead man; “I’m Batman”; “Wait til they get a load of me”; “I have given a name to my pain, and it is Batman.”; “Where does he get those wonderful toys?” You cannot discuss action cinema without bringing up Batman.

Beyond the look and feel of the film, so much is done right. There’s Danny Elfman’s stirring score. There’s the rapid pace and action, but with the focus always on character. There’s the humor that never drifts into camp. There’s the finest portrayal of Alfred (Michael Gough) and a fabulously loony Joker.

And then there is Batman. When Keaton was cast, fanboys went nuts. He was wrong in everyway: too comic, too short. Well, they were wrong. Keaton nails the two sides of the character, Bruce Wayne and Batman. His Batman is dangerous, and for the first, and only time, Batman is scary beyond his violence. His is the only Batman that could frighten criminals in a fundamental way, not just because they don’t like getting beaten up. There’s something unhinged about him.

While Bat-Keaton is treading the line of psychosis, Bruce Wayne is even better. No reasonable man would choose to dress up like a bat to fight crime. Other versions of Bruce have focused on his anger, but angry men don’t get themselves rubber bat suits; they get into bar fights. Keaton’s Wayne is more substantially disturbed. Yes, he’s angry, but it is so much more. This is the only Bruce Wayne I can believe would choose to become Batman. I could believe him choosing to wear a mask made of human skin and carry a chainsaw too. As an actor, Keaton has a talent of being an every man. He’s someone you can imagine seeing at the grocery story. But at the same time, he can embody insanity, a lack of control, and a ruthless dedication. That is Batman.

I suppose I should mention flaws. Hmmmm… I could do without the Prince songs. Here and there the FX looks dated. That’s about it. This is a clever, exciting, funny, emotional, and memorable film. See it. Then see it again.

Batman was followed by Batman Returns, Batman Forever, and Batman & Robin. The character was rebooted into Nolan’s Dark Knight Trilogy: Batman Begins, The Dark Knight, and The Dark Knight Rises. And he has been again rebooted into Zack Snyder’s Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice. Batman first appeared on the big screen in a pair of 1940s serials. He returned in 1966 in Batman: The Movie.

I have ranked the eight theatrical portrayals of Batman.

 Reviews, Superhero Tagged with:
Feb 021989
 
two reels

Three high school students steal a dead body (Gerrit Graham) after they accidentally lose their school cadaver.  Unbeknownst to them, the body has the zombie-making C.H.U.D virus, and soon it is walking around the neighborhood, making more zombies.

Quick Review: Yet another ’80s comedy-zombie film.  Given a R-rating because they’d used up their quota of PGs, this is as wholesome a zombie flick as you are likely to find.  No gore (a bit of blood, but seldom coming from a wound), no nudity, and only TV level profanity, this is a zombie film that’s safe for the whole family.  The humor is broader than in other zombie comedies (with the zombies doing steps similar to those in Michael Jackson’s Thriller video before attacking a school dance).  The cast is filled with entertaining b-actors (Gerrit Graham, Robert Vaughn, Bianca Jagger, Larry Linville, June Lockhart, Norman Fell, Rich Hall, Robert Englund).  It’s not worth remembering, but I had a good enough time while I was watching it.

Back to Zombies

 Reviews, Zombies Tagged with:
Oct 111988
 
two reels

In a small town in 1962, young Frankie Scarlatti (Lukas Haas) is locked in a school closet at night and sees the ghost of a girl reenact her murder.  Shortly after, the killer, with his face hidden, enters in order to retrieve incriminating evidence, finds Frankie, and strangles him.  But the boy is saved by his father (Alex Rocco) and the drunken janitor is wrongly arrested for the crime.  Frankie realizes that the dead girl is the daughter of the Lady in White, the local legendary ghost, and promises the girl that he will help her find her mother.  It also means that he is likely to uncover the killer, and the killer knows it as well.

Mixing horror and comedy is hard, particularly if you want both intact, and not a camp highbred.  Add in a dramatic examination of prejudice and a sweet nostalgia piece on small town life in the ’60s, and it is impossible to pull it off.  Then make it all a kid’s film just so you can show that reality has no claim on you.

Lady and White tries to be all things to all people.  An exceptionally skilled director could have put a few of the divergent elements together (though not all), but writer/director/producer/composer/and sometimes actor, Frank LaLoggia is not that man.  It’s as if he feared he’d never find funding again so had to put everything he’d ever thought of on film now.  But the parts don’t fit: It’s hard to laugh when the problems of racial injustice are hanging over the viewer’s head, and nothing can be all that scary after an idyllic slideshow of a bygone era in upstate New York.  The reality of the situation is destroyed by the slap stick routines of Frankie’s grandparents (the grandfather sets his pants on fire, bangs into a wall, and attempts to drown himself when his cigarettes are taken, only managing to hit his head and get wet).  Extremely emotional moments (such as the father’s tearful revelation of his fear of losing his son, and the reaction of the mother whose child is dead to the man she thinks is the murderer) have no power when surrounded by light-hearted scenes of childhood (the school teacher being shown how to limbo by her students, Frankie riding his bike into peculiar wet cement that doesn’t have any effect on him when it dries, even though it coated him and his bike).

With so many threads, some get forgotten.  The film starts with a grown-up Frankie, now a horror writer, returning to town and narrating the events of his youth.  But after popping in a few times to make sure the viewer has made the connection to A Christmas Story, he is never heard again.  The comedy trails off, and the story of the black man tried for murder gets little screen time.

While nothing in the movie is outstanding, if the elements had been pulled apart, LaLoggia could have made three good movies (the comedy and nostalgia should be kept together), though none of them would have been original.  The arrest of an innocent black man and the hostility of the public has been done numerous times, but it doesn’t seem that everyone has gotten the point, so another version wouldn’t hurt.  The ghost story has the basics to make a good movie, though it has been done more often than the prejudice tale.  A ghost needing people to solve a mystery before it can “go into the light” is old stuff, but there’s still life in the clichĂ©.  However, the action taking place by a cliff over the ocean (with a number of people in the past and present either falling off or almost taking a dive) is too reminiscent of the iconic haunting film, The Uninvited, and that competition is too stiff for any movie.

Too many stories isn’t the only problem, just the biggest.  LaLoggia makes all the typical mistakes of inexperience.  He has the most flammable house in history that could only burn so quickly if it was soaking in gasoline.  Toward the end, the sickly sweet sentimentality would gag  Spielberg.  And there is even a Michael Myers “I’m not dead yet” moment.

For a low-budget indie film, Lady in White is shot well.  The effects work although they occasionally slip into the comical.  And the acting is good across the board.  If you are up for a mish-mash of storytelling topped with schmaltz, you’ll find this moderately entertaining.

 Ghost Stories, Reviews Tagged with:
Oct 111988
 
one reel

Three years after the landing of an alien spacecraft, the “Newcomers” have begun to integrate into American society, much like immigrants before them.  After his partner is killed during a shootout with Newcomers in “Slag Town,” an alien ghetto, Detective Sykes (James Caan) requests Sam Francisco (Mandy Patinkin), the first alien to be made a police detective, as his new partner, thinking this might help him track the killers.

For a few moments, it appears that there will be something interesting in Alien Nation, something we haven’t seen a hundred times before.  Science fiction is at its best when it looks at humanity and human society through metaphor, and Alien Nation sets up a great bit of social introspection. The Newcomers represent immigrants to the U.S. They are proud and want to keep part of their ethnic heritage, but they also want the American dream and freedom. They are hated by many, feared by more, and held in contempt by almost everyone. Workers fear losing their jobs to these foreigners, no one understands their customs, and racial tensions are high.  That’s good stuff. And after ten minutes, it’s all gone. In its place we’re given a buddy cop movie with every clichĂ©.

If you watch even a few movies a year, you’ve already seen this one, just with different actors and makeup. Hey, one of the cops is a hardass and the other plays by the rules. Wow. And the hardass is a lonely divorced slob.  Gee, has that been done before?  They have different backgrounds, which opens up lots of oh-so-funny scenes where one is aghast at the other’s choice in lunch. Hmmmm. I wonder if by the end they will have developed an appreciation for each other? If that isn’t bad enough, they are actually chasing a drug dealer who has significant social standing. Did anyone bother writing this or did they just steal the script from any of a few dozen ’80s buddy films, and then switch the term “black” or “liberal” or “new-ager” or “near-retiree” with “Newcomer”?

The science fiction aspect is light, approaching non-existent. The idea should be to make aliens appear alien enough so that we can view them without preconceived notions, but these extraterrestrials are less foreign then half of the people I know.  Physically, they are humans with spotted, bald heads (OK, I don’t know that many people with spotted heads…not that many…). Odd that they were genetically engendered by other aliens to look like us.  It is a very small universe indeed. They also like to drink sour milk (gosh, isn’t that funny?); that’s about as unusual as it gets.

Patinkin does a respectable, if unexciting job as the stereotypical new cop (with a spotted head), but Caan never works out if this is supposed to be serious or comedic. He tends toward the overacting, broad approach more often than the true-life dramatic one, but really settles for phoning in his performance. I can’t blame him.

With no humor, car chases as action, and nothing to say, Alien Nation is a waste of time better spent speculating on why your socks don’t all match.

It was followed by a short-lived TV series and six made-for-T.V. movies: Alien Nation (1989), Alien Nation: Dark Horizon (1994), Alien Nation: Body and Soul (1995), Alien Nation: Millennium (1996), Alien Nation: The Enemy Within (1996), Alien Nation: The Udara Legacy (1997).

 Aliens, Reviews Tagged with:
Oct 101988
 
three reels

Teens Mike (Grant Cramer) and Debbie (Suzanne Snyder) search for a meteorite, but instead find a circus tent and killer clowns (or Klowns).  The aliens are here to gather up humans to make into sugary snacks.  The teens go to the police, but crotchety officer Mooney (John Vernon) thinks it’s all a joke while Deputy Dave Hansen (John Allen Nelson) is Debbie’s jealous ex-boyfriend.

I’ve never liked clowns.  I was never frightened by them, but they are one of the least funny things I’m likely to run into.  Isn’t there something creepy about a man putting on white face paint, an orange wig, and oversized shoes so as to be acceptable miming around kids?  Should mime ever be acceptable?  Here we are seeing clowns (or is it Klowns? – that’s going to be a problem) in their true, evil form, and finally, finally, I’m liking them.

You’ve got to respect a film that says exactly what it is in the title.  This is a movie where alien Klowns come to Earth, and kill people in silly ways.  You should know as soon as you read the title if this film is for you.

Written as a ’50s alien movie, though set in the ’80s, Killer Klowns from Outer Space most closely resembles The Blob.  Like that film, it has the old man finding the Klowns first, then the two teens seeing the aliens and no one believing them.  Strangely, the sections with the teens are played almost straight, and they’re not funny.  It’s as if the Chiodo brothers, who were responsible for writing, directing and producing, thought that the viewer was going to care about and root for the teens.  I didn’t, and when I saw this the first time in ’88, no one else in the audience did either.  It’s the Klowns I want to see win.

And it is the Klowns that make this fun.  They kill with cotton candy, popcorn, and puppets.  They track with balloon animals and try to lure kids away from their parents so they can hit them with really big mallets.  And there are pies…  Everything connected to clowns becomes a warped weapon, and it’s great to see.  Too bad there wasn’t more with them.

Killer Klowns from Outer Space is a great party movie, and if the teens and cops sections don’t hold up, that gives you time to put out more chips and get another round of beers.

 Aliens, Reviews Tagged with:
Oct 091988
 
four reels

A Scottish archeologist (Peter Capaldi), the lord of the manor (Hugh Grant), and two local girls (Catherine Oxenberg & Sammi Davis) team up to uncover the truth behind the myth of the D’Ampton Worm. That truth is guarded by the serpent priestess and vampire, Lady Syliva (Amanda Donohoe), who is in need of a virgin sacrifice.

Quick Review: Lord D’Ampton: “Do you have children?” Lady Sylvia: “Only when there are no men around.”

That tells you what to expect from Lair of the White Worm, a cult favorite from director Ken Russell. It’s the wit, the subtle and not so subtle (and the completely over-the-top) jokes in almost every line of dialog that sets this above most horror films. These people don’t speak the way people really do, but the way you would like them too.

The Pogues-like song, The D’Ampton Worm, played at a party scene is a treat and sets the mood. Here’s a film that has it all. It has bodies lopped in half, a nude serpent vampire girl painted blue, gory bites, seduction and drowning of a boy scout, blasphemy and religious desecration, nuns raped and impaled on pikes, a giant strap-on phallus, and all with a sense of humor. Hugh Grant, in one of his earlier roles, is a standout as the good-natured, if spoiled, Lord D’Ampton, but it is Amanda Donahoe’s film. Who else could manage expressions of delighted distain as she lies in her bra and panties and washes a boy scout?

 Reviews, Vampires Tagged with:
Oct 091988
 
one reel

Angela (Pamela Springsteen) is a happy but puritanical councilor at Camp Rolling Hills, a summer camp with a lot of overage attendees. She likes nice girls, and when girls aren’t nice, she kills them.

Realizing that the quirky Sleepaway Camp could not be repeated, the filmmakers took a different rout, using the standard camp Slasher story and piling on comedy.  Outside of the name, there is no connection to the earlier film. Young Angela has grown up to become a completely different character, played by a different actress (Pamela Springsteen, Bruce’s sister, putting in as good a performance as the material allows). Now she is outgoing and bouncy.

Unfortunately, none of it quite works. Yes, it’s more fun than a Friday the 13th flick, but that isn’t a recommendation. There’s lots of blood, plenty of breasts, and no thought behind how it fits together. Anyone with female friends willing to go topless could have made this flick. Fritz Gordon is given a writing credit, but Sleepaway Camp II shows no sign of a script. Everything here could have been made up while shooting.

The general idea of a parody Slasher with a bubbly psycho could have worked, but only if the jokes were funny (they’re not), the murders had some shock value (or humor or something), and the nudity was something other than repeated, brief “tit flashes.”

If you are looking for nudity and gore, there are plenty of more exciting choices.

 Reviews, Slashers Tagged with:
Oct 091988
 
two reels

Mass murderer Charles Lee Ray (Brad Dourif) transfers his soul into a doll before dying of gunshot wounds inflicted by detective Mike Norris (Chris Sarandon). The evil doll ends up in the hands of the six-year-old son of Karen Barclay (Catherine Hicks), and soon Chucky is up to his old tricks.

I was ambiguous about Child’s Play while watching it, and apparently, so was director Tom Holland while making it. For the first half hour, Holland creates an above average, creepy little horror film. The actors are more than adequate and the characters act in believable ways (with the exception of the six-year-old kid who is either secretly three, or suffering from some mental problem as most six year olds would find it odd if their toys started talking). But after that, things get silly.

There is something malevolent about dolls in general. Ever look at a row of dolls?  Ghastly things.  And yet, people give these things to their young children. It doesn’t seem that farfetched that one would somehow be responsible for gruesome deaths. That is, until we see it. While Chucky’s deeds are implied, there is a frightening edge. But as soon as the small doll jumps on someone and starts wrestling, it all turns into camp. That wouldn’t be a problem, if Child’s Play were a comedy, but it isn’t. It just keeps marching along like we’re watching Psycho as 5 lbs of fluff beats up an 180 lb man. This is funny stuff, but no one making the film noticed. With my suspension of disbelief blown, I watched as Child’s Play recreated the black knight scene from Monty Python and the Holy Grail (“It’s just a flesh wound”) and played it totally straight. Oh well, I knew where to laugh.

 Reviews, Slashers Tagged with: