Oct 092003
 
two reels

While driving through rural Texas, Erin (Jessica Biel), her boyfriend, Kemper (Eric Balfour), and three others, pick up a girl in shock, who soon after commits suicide.  While attempting to report the incident and rid themselves of the body, they find themselves in a nightmare of assorted inbred maniacs including a drunken sheriff (R. Lee Ermey), and Leatherface, who wears a mask made of human skin and carries a chainsaw.

1974’s The Texas Chain Saw Massacre was a disturbing film.  Poorly filmed and acted, and lacking frights, it gained its cult status through shock and originality, both of which it had in abundance.  It was ripe for a remake since the basic filmmaking skills used could be improved on, but could a new adaptation be shocking and original?  Well, the 2003 version (now with the word “chainsaw” spelled correctly in the title) looks good, and the actors, particularly Biel and Ermey, do a respectable job, even when all they have to do is scream.  But originality is out of reach.  The story is different, eliminating the unbelievable visit to the family farm as the reason for meeting the backwoods freaks.  Instead, the travelers pick up a victim, not one of the killers, and it is her death that sets events in motion.  And the characters are all different as well, except for Leatherface.  But that isn’t enough to make this feel new.  It isn’t even the only brutal, mentally-deficient-inbred-family movie of 2003; House of 1000 Corpses also was inspired by the original Texas Chain Saw Massacre.

Since this is all old material, does it shock?  A little.  It has a few horrific scenes, but mainly, it creates an atmosphere of despair.  Once the five travelers pick up the girl on the road, they are trapped and there isn’t much they can do other than scream and die.  I’m not a big fan of long term hopelessness in film.  I prefer a kick now and then.  There are a few, involving Leatherface and his chainsaw, but not enough.  More time is spent with characters crying, and repeatedly yelling the name of whichever person has wandered off.  It gets a bit dull.

Interestingly, Leatherface isn’t the most frightening of the tribe of fiends.  That honor goes to the sheriff, who won’t be on any tourism ads for Texas.  Leatherface is a stupid brute, who rarely makes a clever move, even when chasing someone.  The sheriff is cruel, vulgar, authoritative, and armed.  While hardly brilliant, he at least has a functioning brain, which makes him feel dangerous.

The film’s only major misstep is the addition of a stolen baby subplot.  It is bizarre to see Erin getting upset about the baby; stealing a baby is the nicest thing any of these people do.  After seeing the skin of one of my friends made into a mask and watching another hang on a hook, I’d find the existence of a stolen baby (who is being treated acceptably) rather humdrum.

While nicely made, without the shock factor, there isn’t a lot of reason to watch the remade The Texas Chainsaw Massacre.  For anyone who never saw the ’74 version (and missed its sequels and the many films based on it), this one will have the proper impact.  But if you haven’t seen the original, I’d recommend finding it instead of this one, for historical reasons if not quality.

 Reviews, Slashers Tagged with:
Oct 092003
 
three reels

After an aberrant clown (Sid Haig), who runs a roadside horror attraction/gas station, tells four teens about a local mass murderer, they go off searching for more information and instead find a family of backwoods psychopaths (Bill Moseley, Sheri Moon, Karen Black).

Ignore the hype (and there is a lot of it); Rob Zombie’s creation is just the comedy party version of The Texas Chain Saw Massacre, with a bit of Italian horror tossed in. I recommended that early Slasher (particularly before watching this), but it doesn’t scream out repeat viewing. It works on shock and it only shocks the first time. So, House of 1000 Corpses works as a replacement for a second viewing of old Leatherface. There’s still some shocks, but due to weirdness. Multiple scene will leave you shaking your head and laughing (and raising your beer in salute). Many of the major characters are named for characters from Marx Brothers films and that’s fitting; this is the horror film that Groucho Marx would have made (assuming he stole corpses at night). Sid Haig’s Captain Spaulding is a memorable freak that will keep clowns in the evil camp for a few extra years. The rest of the cast excels as well with Sheri Moon toping them all with a karaoke rendition of I Want to be Loved by You. That’s when I knew this was less a movie and more a surrealistic amusement park ride. It should have been a more extreme ride. In too many scenes, be it violence, gore, nudity, sex, or humor, it felt like Zombie was pulling his punches. This may be due to studio cutting, with seventeen minutes said to have been sliced (but perhaps those were drab scenes of the teens driving). The final third of the movie loses cohesion. Instead of worrying about plot or character, Zombie goes for stylized shots; he succeeds, but it was the wrong goal. However, House of 1000 Corpses doesn’t exist for thought. It’s there for your next drunken Halloween party.

 Reviews, Slashers Tagged with:
Oct 092003
 
one reel

Freddy (Robert Englund), powerless due to being forgotten, sends Jason back from hell, hoping his killings will be attributed to Freddy. But Jason won’t stop killing, which sets up a battle between the two as local teens try to stop them both.

Quick Review: Freddy deserved better than this, and Jason…well, for Jason it is pretty good. This is supposed to be a no-holds-barred, drag-out, fight to the death between two 80s horror icons. Of course it isn’t. The big climatic battle comes to nothing (yup, they set themselves up for another film). And all actions by the teens affect nothing. So, all you’ve got are some irritating teens dying, and not nearly as many as I expected. I could have done with a whole lot of the fascist adults getting chopped up and a few innovative, shocking, dream sequences, but it was not to be. The blood is plentiful, though not realistic, and a few girls lose their shirts, but without any sensuality. There are worse Slashers, so if all you want is a guy with a blade, you’ll be happy with Freddy Vs. Jason. Me? I was bored.

 Reviews, Slashers Tagged with:
Oct 092003
 
two reels

Once again, a teen’s vision saves a group from certain death. Afterwards, the survivors begin dying in elaborate ways as they desperately search for a way to change fate.

Quick Review: The fun in Final Destination was the Rube Goldberg-like death scenes. Final Destination 2 is more of the same.  The dialog isn’t as sharp and the added way to escape fate is unnecessary, but the convoluted deaths are still a kick. With the exception of Clear Rivers (Ali Larter), a holdover from the first film, Final Destination 2 doesn’t even attempt to create sympathy for the characters. They exist to die, and as they do it well, it’s hard to complain. I can’t rank this any higher as there is nothing that wasn’t done as well or better in the first.

 Reviews, Slashers Tagged with:
Oct 092003
 
Directed, produced, & written by Chris Dowling  16 min.

What I keep wondering while watching The Plight of Clownana is if I should be taking away some deep, life lesson.  Certainly, Ishamel the Clownana, a dancing half-clown, half-banana store mascot thinks so.  Narrated with deep sincerity by writer/director/producer Chris Dowling in a poetic fashion more often heard at a eulogy, Ishamel is struggling with the meaning of life, and what value one man can have.  And each time I watch Clownana, I momentarily try to connect this to my own life.  What is my life worth?  Am I equating my value with something that I do?  Am I competing when there is really no competition?  Am I missing the opportunity to work with others on something greater?  And then I remember I’m watching a man in a banana suit and such philosophizing is trampled under the dancing feet of the Clownana.

While it is uncertain if The Plight of Clownana is successful in imparting any pearls of wisdom, there is no question that it is successful in making people laugh.  This is one funny short film.   I watched it with an audience at the Dragon*Con Short Film Festival and by the climax, it was hard to hear the film over the roar of the crowd.

Ishamel, portrayed by Danny Addams as if he lived at an Up-With-People concert, has imbued his job as an ice-cream hawker with great meaning.  He dances and his world is good.  But it all falls apart when the Sexasaurus Boutique produces its own dancing mascot, Dildo Man.

The situation, while basically humorous, would have been wasted on most first time directors, but Dowling doesn’t let the plot drive the story.  He got me to like Ishamel and his misplaced enthusiasm, a character who can proclaim earnestly, that “Bananas bruise on the inside.”  It is that enthusiasm, that innocent pompousness, that makes the film so amusing.

Shot with 1970s style panache, the quick cuts and zooms meld perfectly with the music.  The nostalgic feeling is intensified when The Clownana prepares for the dance-off to Irene Cara’s “What a Feeling.”  And that leads us to the big payoff.  The dance-off between The Clownana and Dildo Man brings in ribbons, matches, and the complete absurdity of the banana guns, but it is the dancing midgets garbed as testicles that defeats Ishamel and makes The Plight of Clownana one of the top short films on the circuit.  It won the Audience Award for Best Short Film at the Newport Beach Film Festival, and I can see why.  My only reservation is that this is a film best seen with a group.

Oct 082003
 
one reel

When the new Santa (Andy Dick) decides to destroy Hanukkah, it’s up to Mordechai Jefferson Carver (Adam Goldberg), a street-smart Jewish hero, to save the holiday.

Quick Review: I expected very little from a film titled The Hebrew Hammer, but it turned out to have some good performances and humorous concepts.  Unfortunately, due to a nearly non-existent plot, some incredibly unfunny bits (Nora Dunn as a Jewish mother changing a cat’s diaper at the dinner table), and uneven dialog, my original expectations were just about right.  It felt like a Saturday Night Live skit that got away.  The Hebrew Hammer works best when it spoofs the blackploitation genre (with bad-assed Mordechai strutting down the street in pimp gear) or when the love interest, Ester (Judy Greer adding far more sex appeal than the film deserves), recreates the film noir heroine.  Mario Van Peebles as the head of the Kwanza Liberation Front also has some good moments, but the rest is a mess.  Andy Dick sinks to his normal level as Santa, but he can’t be blamed; the part is so poorly written that no one could have wrung a laugh from it.  Goldberg and Greer almost carry what should have been a mildly amusing film, but the weight of tired lines and wasted scenes are just too much for them.

 Christmas, Reviews Tagged with:
Oct 082003
 
one reel

An alcoholic, self-loathing, store Santa (Billy Bob Thornton) and a mastermind dwarf (Tony Cox) rob department stores at Christmastime.

Here is a film that assaults the overripe icons of Christmas, laying low the sickly-sweet sacred cows with a “take no prisoners” roar—except it doesn’t.  It’s more like a troop of girl scouts knocking politely at the door and then wandering off dejectedly.  Nothing here shakes the foundation of the holiday season.  Thornton plays Willie, who drinks a lot, swears a lot, and is rude to children a lot.  It’s pretty much the same bit played over and over.  He meets up with a geeky kid and an attractive bartender (Lauren Graham) with a Santa fetish who lends the film its tender moments (did this film need tender moments?).  Graham is woefully underused.  She pops up but does little.  The same is true of Bernie Mac who is supposed to be the store detective villain of the piece (does this film need a villain?).  He is in the film too little for any depth, but too much for the little he is given to do.  It all ends with as near a Hollywood ending as the filmmakers could manage while still meekly claiming to be anti-social.

Critics have tripped over themselves praising Bad Santa for its boldness in being shocking and gleefully offensive, and it leads me to wonder what kind of monk-like lives they have led.  I don’t think of myself as all that wild, but it takes a bit more than a depressed guy in a Santa suit urinating on himself and swearing to alter my worldview.  If hearing the word “fuck” repeatedly is all it takes to jolt these reviewers, then I can take them down to the local high school for a chat with the students that will blow their minds.

 Christmas, Reviews Tagged with:
Oct 062003
 
one reel

During the great depression, beer baroness (and double amputee) Lady Helen Port-Huntley (Isabella Rossellini) stages a competition for the saddest music in the world.  The competition draws musicians from all over the world, including an ex-lover of Lady Helen who cut off her legs, the son of the ex-lover, who is also an ex-lover, and his brother who carries his dead son’s heart in a jar.  From there, things become strange.

Quick Review: Short film serves a purpose.  If you’ve got a good idea or two and some original style to show off, but don’t have a plot or deep characters, then a fifteen minute short will do the trick.  Sadly, cult director Guy Maddin decided to twist his short into a feature.  There’s good stuff here.  The play-by-play commentary of the sad songs is clever, and the artificial glass beer legs are unusual.  But there’s a lot more surface here than depth.

The script is the stuff of Saturday Night Live skits, as is the acting.  Sure, it’s shot in B&W with more Vaseline than any Penthouse photo-shoot, but that doesn’t make great art.  Someone needs to tell Maddin that a technique is only original once, and after that, it just draws attention to itself.  The fake ’30s film-look was fitting for his Dracula: Pages from a Virgin’s Diary, but now it’s time to see if he can shoot with a clean lens.  There is something of real sorrow here, but it’s not in the film, but about film: the waste of an interesting concept.

 Miscellaneous, Reviews Tagged with:
Oct 062003
 
four reels

The centuries-old war between vampires and werewolves comes to a head when the vampire warrior Selene (Kate Beckinsale) falls in love with Michael (Scott Speedman), a newly created werewolf.  More is at stake then just their relationship, as Michael’s genes hold the secret to ending the war.

Quick Review: Another of the stylish monster films, where art direction is more important than plot and wardrobe wins out over theme (along with Blade, Resident Evil, Van Helsing), but Underworld works even in the areas it is least concerned with.  The story races along, never giving you a moment to think about what is going on.  That’s just as well since the plot may be solid, but the character motivations are often lacking and their decisions a bit abrupt.  Don’t worry about that; this is Romeo and Juliet, so we already know everyone’s motivations.  The look of the film, washed out, blue, deeply focused, and dark, is beautiful.  The vampires are fashion models, with Kate Beckinsale, the queen of this new sub-genre, appearing as sex and violence personified.  There’s enough theme here to leave you thinking about class warfare (vampires = the rich, werewolves = workers), the civil war, racial prejudice, the value of love, and the futility of revenge, but that’s for later.  While watching, it’s all about sensuality.

Followed by Underworld: Evolution.

Oct 052003
 
three reels

Starting almost immediately after the events of the 2001 film, the Creeper (Jonathan Breck), who feeds on human body parts for twenty-three days every twenty-three years, has less than a day left before he goes dormant. After picking off a kid in a cornfield, he targets a bus load of high school students returning from a Championship game. With a crippled vehicle, the student athletes and cheerleaders have no way to fight the beast, and their only help comes from an obsessed farmer (Ray Wise) out for revenge.

Writer/director Victor Salva understands something few in Hollywood do: for good or ill, a sequel should be different from the original. Jeepers Creepers was an eerie picture that went for frights by focusing on two characters and their reaction to an unknown threat. Well, the threat is known now, so that level of tension was not possible.  Instead, Salva gives us a fun, slam-bang horror romp, with multiple, mainly unpleasant teens getting what we hope they’ll get. Again, Salva proves himself to be a skilled director, who keeps the action going. Watching Jeepers Creepers II is less like viewing its dark predecessor and more akin to a few hours in a sports stadium: you can get wrapped up in the game, yelling for a player to make the right move that will keep the team going (and the player from having his spleen eaten).

But like the first film, Salva’s script could use some touching up. Again, he can’t come up with a way for the Creeper’s background to be discovered, so he just has a girl have a dream that fills in the details. This might be an improvement from the wandering psychic in Jeepers Creepers as it is easier to ignore, but it’s every bit as lazy. The characters range from mildly disagreeable to “if the world was good, he would have his liver ripped out,” which is problematic as I should care if these people die. I should also be able to tell them apart, but only the really annoying ones stand out. Luckily, many of them do have their livers ripped out (or something equally important), so the world is good. Again, Salva fails in the dialog department, having everyone bicker with exclamation points ending each sentence. But he has the good graces to break up these bitch-fests with a teen being plucked into the air.

The film does offer up a new kind of bus that must have a papier-mâché roof. Or maybe it’s that the team includes the world’s strongest cheerleader, as she not only can shove a javelin through the roof without effort, but through bone as well. It’s a good thing she is tough as her fellow students aren’t very bright. If I was trapped on a bus with a monster outside, and someone on the radio asked me to come up with some close by landmarks so he could find me, I’d think of some landmarks. I wouldn’t say, “Anything close? Yeah, I’m close to peeing my pants.”

OK, this is a dumb movie. But it is a well shot, well paced, sit-on-the-edge-of-your-seat dumb movie.

Back to Demons

 Demons, Reviews Tagged with:
Oct 052003
 
two reels

With the world in ruins, ex-major John Garth is hired, with the promise of food and medicine, to break into an abandoned estate  to retrieve works of art.  He is given command of a small force of commandoes, including the less-than-honorable Lapierre (Steve Bacic), an officer Garth had dealt with in the past.  All the team has to do is get past an automated defense system, called Encrypt, and Diana (Vivian Wu), the ghost in the machine.

A serviceable, low-budget, sci-fi, action flick that suffers from dull action, but benefits from a better than average back-story.  While starting as a post-apocalyptic tale, the destruction of society is nothing more than a catalyst to get Garth into a combat maze.  This is pure kill-the-monster stuff, and is not unlike watching others play a game of Dungeons & Dragons.  The team walks down corridors, running into monsters and traps.  It takes a greater degree of suspension-of-disbelief than I can muster to accept numbered puzzles on the floor, or invisible warriors (who can’t aim).

Encrypt bit off more than it could chew, which is a minor sin in the world of low budgets.  A majority of super-soldiers-in-a-confined-space films spend most of the time with the soldiers arguing with each other, and running.  This one attempts to stage multiple involved battles, but the money isn’t there.  Those sequences become the least interesting in the film.

Of more interest is the story of Diana, a once-living woman whose spirit resides in the computer and who projects herself as a hologram.  If this movie had been retooled as a mystery story, uncovering her past, it might have held my interest.  Since the focus is on the action, many of the secrets are given as throwaways.  The hologram-human chats also spend far too much time dealing with Garth’s emotions, which can’t be of interest to anyone, including Garth from the way the role is played.  Plus, to pull that off, a lazy script allows Diana to access Garth’s life history, via still functioning national security computers, including a video of his dead wife, but makes her surprised that society has fallen.  Apparently, her data searches are very, very specific.

There’s the start of a good film here, but it needed more variety in its commandoes, more twists in its plot, and a few more dollars in everything.

Oct 052003
 
two reels

Michael Jennings (Ben Affleck) is a high priced computer engineer who takes questionable jobs and then has his memory erased.  After one such job, with three years of memories gone, he finds that he signed away his paycheck and sent himself nineteen worthless objects.  Also, he is wanted by the police.  Something went terribly wrong and those objects are his only clue.

This is great Cyberpunk.  It’s based on a Philip K. Dick story, has a protagonist who really needs to examine his values, and an obsessed, greedy corporate executive.  Top that off with an intriguing, amnesia-fueled mystery, and you’ve got one hell of a film.  Then some idiot hired John Woo.

Yes, John Woo, who’s never met a gunfight he didn’t like.  Sure the balletic shoot-outs were fun in The Killer, but this is a mystery thriller.  Surely, any director with even sub-par talent and a layman’s understanding of film would know to put away those bullets and focus on what’s needed for an intelligent suspense film.  Nope.  Woo just pastes fight scenes in here and there, with no reason and no thought.

Ben Affleck and Uma Thurman (the requisite love-interest) are both fine, but they are playing a programmer and a scientist.  Woo puts them in martial arts duels, gun battles, and motorcycle chases.  It’s even pointed out that Jennings is only a mediocre cyclist, but a moment later he’s engaged in trick riding that would have made Evel Knievel shudder.  When the Woo-compulsory Mexican standoff appeared, I knew that this was a film run by 5-year olds…and Woo.

Woo has stated he neither understands science fiction nor likes it.  That makes me think he shouldn’t direct a science fiction film, but I’m funny that way.  Woo, even sets  Paycheck in modern times (more or less); I must have missed all those developments in memory alteration.

This is the kind of film that frustrates me.  It isn’t like so many that are terrible and were always going to be terrible.  Paycheck had a chance to be a significant, clever, philosophical film, but it isn’t.  Still, like most of Woo’s work, it’s fun in an “I’m a moron” kind of way.  Things blow up.  Wow.

 Cyberpunk, Reviews Tagged with: