Nov 232002
 
three reels

This film has a vast advantage over the other two prequel films: it has parallel stories. The Anakin stuff is again pretty bad, with Christensen putting in a career-mutilating performance as he and Natalie Portman utter uncomfortable ā€œromanticā€ dialog. But with this film, if we removed the bad material, thereā€™s still something left. Obi-Wan has his own quest with no Anakin in sight and that stuff is all pretty good. Thereā€™s huge swaths of the film that arenā€™t embarrassing, which is a triumph for a prequel film. It also helps that segments near the beginning and at the end that do involve Anakin are large ensemble action scenes, thus he canā€™t completely destroy those. Yes, every time Christensen says anything ā€œdramaticā€ it is cringe-worthy, but we aren’t stuck with him, and when we’re off on the water planet, I can just sit back and enjoy the movie. And as an added plus, there is Yoda with a lightsaber; when he broke that out, the entire theater cheered.

I also have a better view of this film than others because of how I first saw it. In 2002, IMAX films were shown on 2 hour reels and often if a film went over 2 hours, they would cut it. So my first viewing of Attack of the Clones was an IMAX version with 20 minutes cutā€”and they did a good job of cutting. It was 20 minutes less of Anakin. If I was ranking just that version, Iā€™d move it up at least one place. That shows that this film, unlike The Phantom Menace and Revenge Of The Sith, is still savable. A good fan edit turns it into a very good film.